There is something deeply wrong with many things. Just ask jwz: https://www.jwz.org/blog/2017/04/would-you-like-to-supersize-that-for-a-dollar-extra/
But at least ed is still the standard editor. Such is progress. On 12 April 2017 at 15:16, Prof Brucee <prof.bru...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ubuntu doesn't return all processes for "ps -e" so I guess there's > something deeply wrong with /proc. > > brucee > > On 12/04/2017 12:56 AM, "Mat Kovach" <m...@well.com> wrote: > > From the man page: > > =$ man ps > > PS(1) PS(1) > > NAME > ps, psu - process status > > SYNOPSIS > ps [ -pa ] > > psu [ -pa ] [ user ] > > [snip] > With the -p flag, ps also prints, after the system time, the > baseline and current priorities of each process. > > The -a flag causes ps to print the arguments for the pro- > cess. Newlines in arguments will be translated to spaces > for display. > > plan9port's ps does not have a '-e' option, if given it is ignore. > > Checking the script, ps uses the os version of ps and the arguments -axww > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Bruce Ellis" <bruce.el...@gmail.com> > *To: *"Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net> > *Sent: *Tuesday, April 11, 2017 2:54:07 AM > *Subject: *[9fans] ps bug > > using plan9ports' "ps -e" does not print all processes. dirread /proc fun > I guess. > brucee > > >
