hfmlacerda
Sun, 05 Dec 2004 08:14:02 -0800
Hello. The code: (6abc``def is (normally) interpreted as 6 notes in the time of 2 notes. Try use a more precise syntax for tuplets, like: (6:4abc``def which stands for 6 notes in the time of 4 notes; or the complete form: (6:4:6abc``def which stands for a proportion of 6 notes in the time of 4, for the next 6 notes; so it's possible do this: (6:4:4cd2``ef2 Best wishes. Hudson Lacerda Em 5 Dec 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: >[Use a wide window for this, it does make sense in a fixed-width font.] > >The following is a right mess in Barfly, both on playback and display: > >X:3 >T:Oh Callar Spirlings (variation 4) >C:Domenico Corri >V:1 >V:2 >M:3/4 >L:1/16 >Q:1/4=90 >K:D Minor >[V:1][L:1/16] A2|(6d^cd`ABc (6dag``fed (6^cde``ABc |(6d^cf`efe >(6a^gad'^c'd' f'2 z2 |\ > (6c=Bc`ede (6g^fg`c'=bc' d'2 z2 |(6d^cd`A=Bc >(6dag`fed (6cde``````````ABc | >[V:2][L:1/8] z | [DF]`[DF] [DF]`[DF] [AEG][A,EG] | [D2F2] z2 > z (3G,/A,/=B,/ |\ > [C2E2] z2 z (3A,/=B,/^C/| D```[DF] >[DF][DF] [A,EG]`````````[A,EG] | >% >[V:1][L:1/16] A2|(6d^cd`ABc (6dag``fed (6^cde``ABc |(6d^cf`efe >(6a^gad'^c'd' f'2 z2 |\ > (6bab``d'c'b (6agf``efg (6 fed`^cde |(6dfa``fad' >d4 z2 || >[V:2][L:1/8] z | D```[DF] [DF]`[DF] [AEG][A,EG] | [D2F2] >z2 z (3G,/A,/=B,/ |\ > G,2 A,2 A,,2 | D,2 > (6D,,/F,,/A,/D,/A,,/F,,/ D,,|| > >The only real change I've made to the score (one of a set of harpsichord >variations from 1780) is to use two treble staves instead of treble and >bass - BarFly doesn't do clef changes in mid-voice. Apart from the weird- >looking finish, that doesn't matter. What does matter is what BarFly does >to the tuplets. Written as above, they are beamed correctly as Corri wrote >them - double beams. But the playback reads them as half the length they >should be, and the staff display gets horribly confused about what length >the bars in the left-hand voice ought to be and how the voices should align. > >I think I've asked Phil about this in a different context before, and he >said the ABC standard insisted on beaming tuplets with one less beam than >the standard practice (i.e. sextuplet semiquavers as here would be beamed >as quavers). Obviously I can't hand a score printed that way to a pianist >and expect her to make sense of it, and there is simply no workaround to >get something that both plays and sounds right without using a pen to add >beams. Does any other ABC application beam tuplets in the conventionally >expected way? And can we fix the standard to mandate double beams and a >correct reading of the note lengths in this situation in future? It can't >affect very much music in the existing ABC corpus. > >Minor bug: the spacer characters between the chords don't work right. > >----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Jack Campin: 11 Third Street, Newtongrange, Midlothian EH22 4PU; 0131 >6604760 > * food intolerance data & >recipes, >Mac logic fonts, Scots traditional music files, and my CD-ROM "Embro, >Embro". >------> off-list mail to "j-c" rather than "abc" at this site, please ><------ > >To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: >http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html > >---------- _________________________________________________________________________________ Quer mais velocidade? Só com o acesso Aditivado iG, a velocidade que você quer na hora que você precisa. Clique aqui: http://www.acessoaditivado.ig.com.br