I think there are good reasons why a XSD is avoided in favor of
RelaxNG ;-)
On Jun 18, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Danny Ayers wrote:
2008/6/18 Jim Ancona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Remy Gendron wrote:
I have found some Atom XSDs… but is there one that is more
'official' than
the others?
Am I right into believing that the Atom spec does not come with a
XSD?
You are correct.
RFC 4287 includes an informative Relax NG schema in Appendix B. Yuu
could
try using Trang (http://www.thaiopensource.com/relaxng/trang.html) to
convert it to XSD.
You might have more luck asking on the atom-syntax list. OTOH, I just
searched there myself and didn't find much relevant. This post looked
interesting, but again the schemas are RNG not XSD:
http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg19894.html
What Jim said (I could never have found such references!)
I'm fairly sure prog APIs exist now in every language under the sun.
May I ask, what do you want the xsd for?
Cheers,
Danny.
S'all good --- chriswberry at gmail dot com
