aesthetics-l  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Fw: old and new William Conger
  • Re: Fw: old and new john m
  • Re: Fw: old and new William Conger
  • Re: Fw: old and new Cheerskep
• "This is just another instance of a society that 'would rather everything be art than anyone feel excluded from the realms of sanctified culture.'" joseph berg
  • Re: "This is just another instance of a society that 'would rather everything be art than anyone feel excluded from the realms of sanctified culture.'" William Conger
  • Re: "This is just another instance of a society that 'would rather everything be art than anyone feel excluded from the realms of sanctified culture.'" joseph berg
• experience and resonance john m
  • Re: experience and resonance William Conger
  • Re: experience and resonance john m
  • Re: experience and resonance William Conger
  • Re: experience and resonance john m
  • Re: experience and resonance William Conger
  • Re: experience and resonance john m
  • Re: experience and resonance Cheerskep
  • Re: experience and resonance William Conger
  • Re: experience and resonance ARMANDO BAEZA
  • Re: experience and resonance john m
  • Re: experience and resonance William Conger
  • Re: experience and resonance john m
  • Re: experience and resonance William Conger
  • Re: experience and resonance Michael Brady
  • Re: experience and resonance William Conger
  • Re: experience and resonance john m
  • Re: experience and resonance Cheerskep
  • Re: experience and resonance john m
  • Re: experience and resonance Cheerskep
  • Re: experience and resonance john m
  • Re: experience and resonance Cheerskep
  • Re: experience and resonance Cheerskep
  • Re: experience and resonance Cheerskep
  • Re: experience and resonance ARMANDO BAEZA
  • Re: experience and resonance Tom McCormack
  • Re: experience and resonance ARMANDO BAEZA
• Fwd: [AE] Fwd: CFP: Art as a Mode of Enquiry: Symposium lslbsc2
• "Meanings" and "meanings for you". Cheerskep
  • Re: "Meanings" and "meanings for you". William Conger
  • Re: "Meanings" and "meanings for you". Cheerskep
  • Re: "Meanings" and "meanings for you". William Conger
  • Re: "Meanings" and "meanings for you". Cheerskep
  • RE: "Meanings" and "meanings for you". Frances Kelly
  • RE: "Meanings" and "meanings for you". Frances Kelly
  • Re: "Meanings" and "meanings for you". Cheerskep
  • RE: "Meanings" and "meanings for you". Frances Kelly
  • RE: "Meanings" and "meanings for you". Frances Kelly
• Vivian Maier William Conger
  • Re: Vivian Maier Cheerskep
  • Re: Vivian Maier William Conger
  • Re: Vivian Maier john m
  • Re: Vivian Maier William Conger
• descriptive aesthetics? (revised) john m
  • descriptive aesthetics? (revised) john m
  • Re: descriptive aesthetics? (revised) ARMANDO BAEZA
  • Re: descriptive aesthetics? (revised) William Conger
  • Re: descriptive aesthetics? (revised) john m
  • Re: descriptive aesthetics? (revised) William Conger
  • Re: descriptive aesthetics? (revised) Cheerskep
• defining "creative process" john m
  • Re: defining "creative process" William Conger
• defining "artworks" john m
  • Re: defining "artworks" William Conger
  • defining "artworks" john m
  • Re: defining "artworks" William Conger
  • Re: defining "artworks" Saul Ostrow
  • Re: defining "artworks" William Conger
  • Re: defining "artworks" Saul Ostrow
  • Re: defining "artworks" William Conger
  • Re: defining "artworks" john m
  • Re: defining "artworks" William Conger
  • Re: defining "artworks" ARMANDO BAEZA
  • Re: defining "artworks" ARMANDO BAEZA
  • defining "artworks" john m
  • Re: defining "artworks" john m
  • Re: defining "artworks" joseph berg
  • Re: defining "artworks" joseph berg
  • Re: defining "artworks" john m
  • Re: defining "artworks" Cheerskep
  • Re: defining "artworks" john m
• Re: "I have found that being too original loses the audience...One thing I have observed is that people want to relate to a work. Things too original don't obviously show where the ideas came from." Cheerskep
• "I have found that being too original loses the audience...One thing I have observed is that people want to relate to a work. Things too original don't obviously show where the ideas came from." joseph berg
  • Re: "I have found that being too original loses the audience...One thing I have observed is that people want to relate to a work. Things too original don't obviously show where the ideas came from." William Conger
• Re: "You've got to choose between happiness and what people used to call high art. We've sacrificed the high art." Cheerskep
• Eric Kandel and the Age of Insight caldwell-brobeck
• descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? William Conger
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? William Conger
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Michael Brady
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? William Conger
  • RE: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Frances Kelly
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Cheerskep
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Michael Brady
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? William Conger
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? William Conger
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? William Conger
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Cheerskep
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Cheerskep
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Cheerskep
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? ARMANDO BAEZA
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? ARMANDO BAEZA
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? William Conger
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? ARMANDO BAEZA
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Cheerskep
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • RE: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Frances Kelly
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Cheerskep
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? ARMANDO BAEZA
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? ARMANDO BAEZA
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? ARMANDO BAEZA
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? ARMANDO BAEZA
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? joseph berg
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? ARMANDO BAEZA
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? ARMANDO BAEZA
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Cheerskep
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Cheerskep
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Cheerskep
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Cheerskep
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? William Conger
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Michael Brady
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? ARMANDO BAEZA
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Cheerskep
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Cheerskep
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Cheerskep
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Cheerskep
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Michael Brady
  • RE: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Frances Kelly
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Cheerskep
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Michael Brady
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? lslbsc2
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? William Conger
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Cheerskep
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Michael Brady
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? William Conger
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Cheerskep
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? William Conger
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Cheerskep
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? William Conger
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Cheerskep
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? William Conger
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? ARMANDO BAEZA
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? William Conger
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Cheerskep
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? William Conger
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Cheerskep
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? Cheerskep
  • Re: descriptive / empirical aesthetics? john m
• "You've got to choose between happiness and what people used to call high art. We've sacrificed the high art." joseph berg
  • Re: "You've got to choose between happiness and what people used to call high art. We've sacrificed the high art." William Conger
  • Re: "You've got to choose between happiness and what people used to call high art. We've sacrificed the high art." joseph berg
  • Re: "You've got to choose between happiness and what people used to call high art. We've sacrificed the high art." William Conger
  • Re: "You've got to choose between happiness and what people used to call high art. We've sacrificed the high art." joseph berg
  • Re: "You've got to choose between happiness and what people used to call high art. We've sacrificed the high art." joseph berg
  • Re: "You've got to choose between happiness and what people used to call high art. We've sacrificed the high art." William Conger
  • Re: "You've got to choose between happiness and what people used to call high art. We've sacrificed the high art." joseph berg
• Remembering words Michael Brady
  • Re: Remembering words Cheerskep
• "Traditional values were being dissected in a systematic way in the art world, the YBA (Young British Artists) were in full flow, and ’92 was the year Damien Hirst released his masterpiece, The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone L joseph berg
• "Aesthetic experiences" Cheerskep
  • Re: "Aesthetic experiences" ARMANDO BAEZA
• (Upcoming tv program): "Daniel Flynn looks back at a time in the U.S. when the general population was interested in high culture and intellectuals were as important to popular culture as entertainers were." joseph berg
• "Auction houses and museums, eager for new masters to canonize, are showcasing Mr. Richter's works around the world at an ever-increasing clip." joseph berg
• "Whereas the old morality saw things as so simple that moral judgment was always easy, the new morality sees things so complicated that moral judgment becomes practically impossible. joseph berg
  • Re: "Whereas the old morality saw things as so simple that moral judgment was always easy, the new morality sees things so complicated that moral judgment becomes practically impossible. William Conger
  • Re: "Whereas the old morality saw things as so simple that moral judgment was always easy, the new morality sees things so complicated that moral judgment becomes practically impossible. joseph berg
• Psychedelic art joseph berg
  • Re: Psychedelic art William Conger
  • Re: Psychedelic art Mike Mallory
  • Re: Psychedelic art joseph berg
  • Re: Psychedelic art William Conger
  • Re: Psychedelic art joseph berg
  • Re: Psychedelic art joseph berg
  • Re: Psychedelic art Cheerskep
  • Re: Psychedelic art William Conger
  • Re: Psychedelic art joseph berg
  • Re: Psychedelic art joseph berg
  • Re: Psychedelic art William Conger
  • Re: Psychedelic art joseph berg
  • Re: Psychedelic art joseph berg
  • Re: Psychedelic art joseph berg
  • Re: Psychedelic art William Conlin

• Earlier messages
• Later messages