You see. This is precisely why I don't want to argue with Mike anymore. "it must be a physical pattern". LOL. Who ever said that patterns must be physical? This is exactly why you can't see my point of view. You impose unnecessary restrictions on any possible solution when there really are no such restrictions.
Dave On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Mike Tintner <tint...@blueyonder.co.uk>wrote: > John:It can be defined mathematically in many ways > > Try it - crude drawings/jottings/diagrams totally acceptable. See my set of > fotos to Dave. > > (And yes, you're right this is of extreme importance. And no. Dave, there > are no such things as "non-physical patterns"). > > ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=8660244-6e7fb59c Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
