I recently discovered (this may be obvious to many of you) that running an analog.exe, modified in the manner described below, allows access of up to 4GB on 64-bit versions of Windows.
This allows processing of twice as much data over the official analog.exe Windows binary. I gleaned the key information from the upper-right cell in the table on this page: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366778.aspx "4 GB with IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE set" On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Nick Altmann <nick...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've had a little success working around the 2GB memory limit issue with > the 32-bit analog.exe for Windows. > > After trying to see if I could re-compile Analog with 3GB support, I found > it was possible to directly edit the existing binary using this command: > > editbin.exe /LARGEADDRESSAWARE analog.exe > > This created a version of analog.exe that can access up to 3GB of memory on > Windows systems that have the /3GB switch enabled. > > It's not as good as a full 64-bit version (any progress on that front?), > but it may give some of you a little more breathing room. > > I still don't know how to modify the source or compiling parameters for > this, but you can use the command above to achieve the same effect. > > I'm happy to send the .exe to anyone who's interested. > > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Aengus <analo...@eircom.net> wrote: > >> Joelle Tegwen <jteg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > I realize that I'm asking the choir here, but I'm hoping to get an >> > honest assessment. >> > >> > We're looking for a new log analyzer. The two that consistently came >> > up were AWStats and Analog. Analog seems like a great product, but it >> > seems to be no longer under development. We don't have anyone on staff >> > who could update this so if updates or changes needed to be made, we >> > would be out of luck. >> > >> > Is it worth it to start using Analog now? Are there current open bugs >> > that are a concern? How would we deal with new browsers/OS (like >> > Vista)? Or is this project going away and we should look elsewhere for >> > a log analyzer? >> > >> > Are there other issues I should be aware of? >> >> Off the top of my head, I can't think of anything that I would describe as >> an "open bug". While the current version of Analog was released 4 years ago, >> there haven't really been any significant changes in the Web log landscape >> in that time, except the addition of Windows Vista to the OS report, and >> there are user contributed patches that address that. Presumably someone >> will add Windows 7 in the near future too. A 64-bit compiled version for >> Windows might also be more useful now than it was 4 years ago, but that's a >> prolem with the available tools, rather than with Analog itself. As the >> availability of 64-bit tools for Windows development improves, expet to see >> a user-contributed build of 64-bit Analog for Windows. (64-bit versions for >> other operating systems are already available). >> >> Analog has remained pretty static because the flexibity and customization >> that it offers comes from changes made to config files, not from code >> modifications and recompilation. >> >> Is it worth starting to use Analog now? I'd turn that question around - is >> there any reason not to use Analog? If Analog doesn't deliver on some of >> your needs today, it's probably not going to change significantly at this >> point. On the other hand, if you have a good idea what you want to get from >> your log files, and Analog delivers on those needs, then it's going to keep >> delivering. >> >> Aengus >> >> +------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: >> | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help >> | >> | Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html >> | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives >> | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general >> +------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > >
+------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general +------------------------------------------------------------------------