Hi Drasko,
> Do you really need an Atomthreads dedicated simulator ? What would be > benefit of OS dedicated simulator ? > I think that it would be safer to use well tested simulator soulutions > (for example qemu can be used for many ARM achitectures, and SkyEye > for ARM7TDMI). > It will be very useful in the future to have architecture-specific simulators like qemu and simavr up and running, but in the meantime a local simulator might be useful for testing generic application code, as well as testing and debugging core kernel modules. It will always be necessary to run the test suite on each architecture port, but this will make it very easy to automate the running of the automated tests where generic (non-port) code is concerned. I took a look at Simavr site - seems promising. I will try to > configure this one. > It seems to have all that I need. As I understand, your AVR port is > for ATmega128 ? > Simavr has support for this SoC and gdb support to look what is > happening... > It should be possible to run it on most ATmega devices. I have personally run it on ATmega16 and ATmega32, and others have reported success on ATmega168, ATmega2560/1 and others. Best regards, Kelvin.
