autoconf-patches  

Re: Explanation in autoconf manual

Ralf Wildenhues
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:31:34 -0800

* Eric Blake wrote on Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:51:47PM CET:
> The autoconf manual already has a number of places that call out behavior
> both with and without automake.  So, I think the best thing to do here is
> try and expand the diagram to show that automake is optional, as well as
> how it fits in when used.  Here's what I'm thinking of; any ideas for
> improvements?

Looks fine to me, thanks.

Cheers,
Ralf