Chris Walker
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:21:56 -0700
>From jimc [07/20 15:31]: > Actually, only the sysop knows which is more important: doing the mount > storm to respond to stat() or statfs(), or avoiding the storm. Agreed. In our case, we have 'heavily discouraged' use of /net on our big servers and we would prefer that statfs()/stat() waited for the automount to complete. -- Chris Walker -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list autofs@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs