automake  

Messages by Thread

• *simple* example using Autotest Robert Boehne
  • Re: *simple* example using Autotest Eric Blake
  • Re: *simple* example using Autotest Robert Boehne
• The case of libkmod's .so versioning attempts, and induced collisions Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: The case of libkmod's .so versioning attempts, and induced collisions Peter O'Gorman
• splitting MANS into pieces to avoid long install-man command lines Brice Goglin
  • splitting MANS into pieces to avoid long install-man command lines Brice Goglin
  • Re: splitting MANS into pieces to avoid long install-man command lines Stefano Lattarini
• Automake 1.11.3 released Stefano Lattarini
• Bundling CMake subpackage with autoconf project? Hartmut Holzgraefe
• Automake 1.11.2b test release Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2b test release Ralf Corsepius
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2b test release Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2b test release NightStrike
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2b test release Eric Blake
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2b test release Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2b test release Peter Rosin
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2b test release Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2b test release Peter Rosin
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2b test release Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2b test release Peter Rosin
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2b test release Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2b test release Peter Rosin
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2b test release Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2b test release Peter Rosin
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2b test release Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2b test release Bob Friesenhahn
• bug#10555: automake: wrong use of F77FLAGS instead of FFLAGS? Stefano Lattarini
• bug#10568: automake-1.11.1 1 of 643 tests failed Dennis Clarke
• allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Bill Sacks
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Daily, Jeff A
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Miles Bader
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Bill Sacks
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Miles Bader
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Bill Sacks
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Bill Sacks
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Miles Bader
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Nick Bowler
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Miles Bader
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Miles Bader
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Bill Sacks
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Paul Smith
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Nick Bowler
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? Nick Bowler
  • Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools? NightStrike
• RFC: cool hack for simplifying do_subst generation of scripts Eric Blake
  • Re: RFC: cool hack for simplifying do_subst generation of scripts Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: RFC: cool hack for simplifying do_subst generation of scripts Federico Simoncelli
• Re: [RCF] parallel-tests: removing the "check-html" target and the .log -> .html conversion? Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: [RCF] parallel-tests: removing the "check-html" target and the .log -> .html conversion? Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [RCF] parallel-tests: removing the "check-html" target and the .log -> .html conversion? Stefano Lattarini
• Scripts in pkglibexecdir? Dennis Schridde
  • Re: Scripts in pkglibexecdir? Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Scripts in pkglibexecdir? Stefano Lattarini
• What is it with the dependency on config.status Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: What is it with the dependency on config.status Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: What is it with the dependency on config.status Daniel Herring
  • Re: What is it with the dependency on config.status Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: What is it with the dependency on config.status Nick Bowler
  • Re: What is it with the dependency on config.status Stefano Lattarini
• bug#9658: bug report reopened Stefano Lattarini
• PCH support Olaf van der Spek
  • Re: PCH support Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: PCH support Warren Young
  • Re: PCH support Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: PCH support Dave Hart
  • Re: PCH support Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: PCH support Olaf van der Spek
  • Re: PCH support Miles Bader
  • Re: PCH support Olaf van der Spek
  • Re: PCH support Miles Bader
  • Re: PCH support Olaf van der Spek
  • Re: PCH support Miles Bader
  • Re: PCH support Olaf van der Spek
  • Re: PCH support Olaf van der Spek
  • Re: PCH support Olaf van der Spek
  • Re: PCH support Russ Allbery
• Automake 1.11.2 released Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2 released Antonio Diaz Diaz
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2 released Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2 released Antonio Diaz Diaz
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2 released Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2 released Antonio Diaz Diaz
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2 released Miles Bader
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2 released Antonio Diaz Diaz
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2 released Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2 released Dave Hart
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2 released Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: Automake 1.11.2 released Antonio Diaz Diaz
  • Add support for user-defined compressors (was: Re: Automake 1.11.2 released) Stefano Lattarini
• Merging the msvc branch into maint Peter Rosin
  • Re: Merging the msvc branch into maint Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Merging the msvc branch into maint Peter Rosin
  • Re: Merging the msvc branch into maint Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Merging the msvc branch into maint Peter Rosin
  • Re: Merging the msvc branch into maint Stefano Lattarini
• Re: {Automake-NG} mailing lists are cheap Stefano Lattarini
• Re: [Platform-testers] Automake 1.11.1b test release Stefano Lattarini
• How to specify a library as dependecy to a executable ittium
  • Re: How to specify a library as dependecy to a executable Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: How to specify a library as dependecy to a executable ittium
  • Re: How to specify a library as dependecy to a executable Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: How to specify a library as dependecy to a executable ittium
  • Re: How to specify a library as dependecy to a executable Stefano Lattarini
• [FYI] New experimental branch `automake-ng' Stefano Lattarini
• bug#10278: color-p.test failed Savio Wong
• make dist-lzma and make dist-xz Peter Rosin
  • Re: make dist-lzma and make dist-xz Peter Rosin
  • Re: make dist-lzma and make dist-xz Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: make dist-lzma and make dist-xz Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: make dist-lzma and make dist-xz Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: make dist-lzma and make dist-xz Peter Rosin
  • Re: make dist-lzma and make dist-xz Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: make dist-lzma and make dist-xz Peter Rosin
• Automake 1.11.1b test release Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Automake 1.11.1b test release Ralf Corsepius
  • Re: Automake 1.11.1b test release Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Automake 1.11.1b test release Ralf Corsepius
  • Re: Automake 1.11.1b test release Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: Automake 1.11.1b test release Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Automake 1.11.1b test release Adam Mercer
  • Re: Automake 1.11.1b test release Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Automake 1.11.1b test release Peter Johansson
• Solaris 10 -z text Art Hundiak
• Writing a rule Stefan
• bug#10226: Drop redundant Python 1.5 support? Stefano Lattarini
• bug#10237: AM_SILENT_RULES does not work with NonStop make Roumen Petrov
  • bug#10237: AM_SILENT_RULES does not work with NonStop make Eric Blake
• Fwd: Test Message - HTML Format:Rabbi Zamir Cohen In New York Hidabroot America
• Calculating Perl module installation directory Adam Spiers
  • Re: Calculating Perl module installation directory Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Calculating Perl module installation directory Adam Spiers
  • Re: Calculating Perl module installation directory Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Calculating Perl module installation directory Adam Spiers
  • Re: Calculating Perl module installation directory Stefano Lattarini
• auto-generated source files and automake dchiaramello
  • Re: auto-generated source files and automake dchiaramello
  • Directions on compiling the right files Fabrício Zimmerer Murta
  • Re: Directions on compiling the right files dherring
  • Re: Directions on compiling the right files Fabrício Zimmerer Murta
• minor error and a question Joakim Tjernlund
  • Re: minor error and a question Peter Johansson
  • Re: minor error and a question Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: minor error and a question Ralf Wildenhues
  • Re: minor error and a question Joakim Tjernlund
  • Re: minor error and a question Dave Hart
  • Re: minor error and a question Joakim Tjernlund
• bug#10157: broken links at http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/ Adam Spiers
  • bug#10157: broken links at http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/ Stefano Lattarini
  • bug#10157: broken links at http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/ Stefano Lattarini
• glib-object.h: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden -- while running make David Boesner
  • Re: glib-object.h: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden -- while running make Baurzhan Ismagulov
• dirstamp and other mysteries Adam Spiers
  • Re: dirstamp and other mysteries Adam Spiers
  • Re: dirstamp and other mysteries Adam Spiers
  • Re: dirstamp and other mysteries Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: dirstamp and other mysteries Adam Spiers
• Still help needed at creating Makefile.am Stefan
  • Re: Still help needed at creating Makefile.am Dave Hart
  • Re: Still help needed at creating Makefile.am Stefan
• Lex support for Makefile.am kishoramballi
  • Lex support for Makefile.am kishoramballi
  • Lex support for Makefile.am kishoramballi
  • Lex support for Makefile.am kishoramballi
  • Re: Lex support for Makefile.am Stefano Lattarini
• Help at making Makefile.am needed Stefan
• bug#10111: remake rules can fail in a weird corner case (VPATH into $distdir). Stefano Lattarini
• Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? (was: Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] portability) Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? (was: Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] portability) Paul Smith
  • Re: Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? (was: Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] portability) Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? (was: Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] portability) Olaf van der Spek
  • Re: Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? (was: Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] portability) Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? (was: Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] portability) Stefan
  • Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? Paolo Bonzini
  • Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? Paolo Bonzini
  • Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? Ralf Corsepius
  • Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? Ralf Corsepius
  • Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? Harlan Stenn
  • Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? Warren Young
  • Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? Harlan Stenn
  • Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? Warren Young
  • Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? Warren Young
  • Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? Paul Smith
  • Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? Dave Hart
  • Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Could automake-generated Makefiles required GNU make? Warren Young

• Earlier messages