Dale Young
Sun, 27 Apr 2008 11:47:32 -0700
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2008 4:04 PM Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: Kirnberger on lutes and temperament
On 4/26/2008, "Roman Turovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:In good English it might go something like:"As logarhythms are Greek to most musicians, they are rarely considered, and are never used, so IMHO, it would be easier to speak in arithmetical terms. ET is, unconditionally, a totally abominable/execrable system, and can onlybe used to tune a theorbo, a lute etc., because in these instruments all other temperaments are USELESS." I must say I agree, wholeheardedly.Luckily Kirnberger represents late baroque period (nearly early classism), not the real baroque (as Monteverdi et al), not to speak about renaissance. In Kirnberg's times lute was not anymore an important instrument... best, Arto
...the lute was not anymore an
It was, however, the time when the best music was written for it, ever. A good tune is more interesting ( to me) than pure thirds and a bunch of half baked poly-phony.important instrument...
your Galant chauvinist friend,
Dale
To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html