bigforth  

[bigforth] include locals.fs bigforth vs xbigforth

Sergey M Plis
Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:54:29 -0800

I have a question regarding locals. The files where I use them contain the following line:

\needs locals include locals.fs

They used to contain this line and seemed to work but there was some trouble:

\needs locals| include locals.fs

Now I am having a problem. Whenever I run bigforth everything works just fine because if locals.fs is included then locals is defined. In *xbigforth*, however, locals is not defined even the locals subset is there. Shouldn't locals be also defined in xbigforth since they are loaded by default there?

Thanks!

--
Sergey

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]