Who is actually planning to move to Bitcoin-XT if this happens? Just Gavin and Mike?
> On Jun 15, 2015, at 6:17 PM, Faiz Khan <faizkha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm quite puzzled by the response myself, it doesn't seem to address some of > the (more serious) concerns that Adam put out, the most important question > that was asked being the one regarding personal ownership of the proposed > fork: > > "How do you plan to deal with security & incident response for the duration > you describe where you will have control while you are deploying the > unilateral hard-fork and being in sole maintainership control?" > > I do genuinely hope that whomever (now and future) wishes to fork the > protocol reconsider first whether they are truly ready to test/flex their > reputation/skills/resources in this way... Intuitively, to me it seems > counterproductive, and I don't fully believe it is within a single > developer's talents to manage the process start-to-finish (as it is > non-trivial to hard-fork successfully, others have rehashed this in other > threads)... > > That being said I think it appropriate if Adam's questions were responded > in-line when Mike is feeling up to it. I think that the answers are important > for the community to hear when such a drastic change is being espoused. > > Faiz > >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Bryan Bishop <kanz...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Mike Hearn <m...@plan99.net> wrote: >>> Re: anyone who agrees with noted non-programmers Mike&Gavin must be >>> non-technical, stupid, uninformed, etc .... OK, go ahead and show them the >>> error of their ways. Anyone can write blogs. >> >> I worry that if this is the level of care you take with reading and >> (mis)interpreting Adam's messages, that you might not be taking extreme care >> with evaluating consensus changes, even while tired or sleeping. I encourage >> you to evaluate both messages and source code more carefully, especially in >> the world of bitcoin. However, this goes for everyone and not just you. >> Specifically, when Adam mentioned your conversations with non-technical >> people, he did not mean "Mike has talked with people who have possibly not >> made pull requests to Bitcoin Core, so therefore Mike is a non-programmer". >> Communication is difficult and I can understand that, but we really have to >> be more careful when evaluating each other's messages; technical >> miscommunication can be catastrophic in this context. On the topic of >> whether you are a programmer, I suspect that ever since you built CIA.vc we >> have all known you're a programmer, Mike. >> >> - Bryan >> http://heybryan.org/ >> 1 512 203 0507 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bitcoin-development mailing list >> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >> >> -- >> >> My regards, >> >> Faiz Khan > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
