David Abrahams
Tue, 26 Aug 2003 16:27:18 +0000
"Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I guess there is no equivalent to memcpy_moveable: but it looks rather >> dangerous, what state is the original object left in afterwards etc? > > None. There is no original object after the move, only raw storage. ...which is a different meaning from move in our move proposal -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost