Re: [boost] Re: Re: Optional, tie, and iterator_adaptor

[Gregory Colvin]

On Monday, Sep 1, 2003, at 11:31 America/Denver, Joel de Guzman wrote:

Fernando Cacciola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

vector<>::begin returns an object with operators * and ->,
yet these objects are not pointers, and once that is learned,
people do not think they are pointers.
Huh? pointer semantics (behavior) does not mean that they
have to be pointers.
But would the following hold if p and q are optionl<int>?

*q = 1;
p = q;
*p = 2;
assert(*q == 2);
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost