James Watts
Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:09:21 -0700
Hello all, To close the loop...
I will echo the results described in the message link Antonio sent below. Wow, what a difference the file system choice makes! Following advice from Antonio and another contributor to this buglist, I switched the recovery drive to EXT3 and imaged ~300 of 500GB overnight. The data rate averaged around 20MB/s. Amazing! There is clearly some flaw in NTFS-3G. Using the same setup with both drives formatted as NTFS, the data rate started high (~20MB/s) and gradually decayed to under 100KB/s, never increased, and only imaged ~30 of 500GB overnight. Does anyone know if this issue has been reported to the NTFS-3G team? If not, I'd like to log a bug or at least report results to them. Finally, I'd like to thank the ddrescue author and community for all the informative responses and suggestions. A true testament to the strength of open source community. Thank you very much for helping me speed things up! Cheers, James On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Antonio Diaz Diaz <ant_d...@teleline.es>wrote: > James Watts wrote: > >> What is the filesystem in your destination drive (/media/recoverydrive)? >>> >> >> Both drives use a single, NTFS partition. >> > > NTFS is probably the reason of the slowness. See this message (NTFS-3g > eating 100%. Solved by switching to ext3) > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ddrescue/2009-06/msg00004.html > > > Regards, > Antonio. > >
_______________________________________________ Bug-ddrescue mailing list Bug-ddrescue@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-ddrescue