On Mar 27, 2017, at 22:20 , Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> wrote: > >> This command can produce either an \override or a \tweak of >> a spanner property. > > But that’s exactly the point: \alterBroken (and \shape and \offset) can act > _both_ as an override _and_ a tweak, so its syntax must be different from > either one of these.
Can we agree that in an ideal world, a command that acts like an override would look like an override, and a command that acts like a tweak would look like a tweak? Surely the command can not act as both in the same instance. Could it be split into two commands, say \overrideBroken and \tweakBroken? Could the before- and after-break values be aggregated, e.g. \override Grob.property = #(make-broken …)? Regards, — Dan _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
