On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Federico Bruni <f...@inventati.org> wrote: > > > Il giorno mer 7 giu 2017 alle 15:24, David Nalesnik > <david.nales...@gmail.com> ha scritto: >> >> Hi Federico, >> >> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Federico Bruni <f...@inventati.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all >>> >>> While translating, I think I caught an error in the doc: >>> >>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/the-offset-command >>> >>> """ >>> The following example displaces the ‘broken’ OttavaBracket object >>> through >>> its staff-padding property. Since the property takes a number, offsets >>> is >>> provided with a list of numbers to account for the two segments created >>> by >>> the line break. The slur piece on the first line is effectively >>> untouched >>> since 0 is added to its default value. The segment on the second line is >>> raised two staff-spaces from its default height. The default height >>> happens >>> to be 2, though it is not __necesssary__ to know this. >>> >>> > > > another typo: "necesssary" >
Thanks! > >>> { >>> \offset staff-padding #'(0 3) Staff.OttavaBracket >>> \ottava #1 >>> c'''2 c''' >>> \break >>> c'''2 c''' >>> } >>> >>> """ >>> >>> >>> - 1st problem: All the text from "The slur piece on the first line" do >>> not >>> refer to the OttavBracket example, which is what is supposed to be >>> discussed >>> in that paragraph, but to the example after that (the example which >>> mimics >>> the effect of the \shape command). >> >> >> No, the paragraph actually does refer to the OttavaBracket example. >> The problem is a simple typo: "the slur piece" ought to read "the >> bracket piece" or "the ottava bracket piece". (Do you want to change >> this, or should I?) >> > > Ok, it makes sense now. > Please take care of the change. I'm busy with updating the italian > translation... > Will do. >>> >>> - 2nd problem (maybe): I'm not even sure that the "slur on the second >>> line >>> is raised two staff-spaces from its default height". Isn't 1.5 for the >>> endpoints? Here's the example: >>> >>> { >>> c'4-\offset control-points #'( >>> ((0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 1)) >>> ((0.5 . 1.5) (1 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . -1.5)) >>> ) ( f'4 g' c'' >>> \break >>> d'4 c'' f' c') >>> } >>> >> >> Again, this is remedied by fixing the typo. The default value of >> OttavaBracket.staff-padding is 2.0. (An issue could be raised with my >> referring to a setting which could be changed at some point making the >> reference inaccurate, but that's another issue!) >> >> > > Ok, but I thought that in the OttavaBracket example the segment in the > second line was raised by 3 (not 2) staff spaces. > > Ah, OK -- that too!! (Maybe I ought to make this clearer in the explanation: the default value is 2.0, so the effect of the offset command would to be raise the bracket 2 + 3 = 5 staff spaces.) -David _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond