Re: [Catalyst] Using Catalyst with mod_per or FastCGI on heavy traffic web application

[xenoterrac...@gmail.com]

Hmm. Perhaps i misunderstand the concept. I was thinking there was the third 
option of using a psgi server or mod psgi 
-----Original Message-----
Date: Friday, January 29, 2010 8:50:07 pm
To: "catalyst" <catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk>
From: "Hans Dieter Pearcey" <hdp.perl.catalyst.us...@weftsoar.net>
Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Using Catalyst with mod_per or FastCGI on heavy traffic 
web application

Excerpts from xenoterrac...@gmail.com's message of Fri Jan 29 20:22:48 -0500 
2010:
> Enlightening how do you feel about fastcgi vs psgi?

This question makes no sense.  How do you feel about HTML vs. HTTP?

PSGI is an interface for Perl code.  FastCGI is an interface for network
communications.  They aren't in the same problem space, except to the degree
that there are FastCGI servers that then run PSGI applications.

hdp.

_______________________________________________
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/



_______________________________________________
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/