RE: [CFXML_Blog] Linux/Windows source tree (was RE: CFXML_blog on SourceForge)

[Steven Erat]

Bryan:  Integrating Java into your CFML in this manner is perfectly supported by 
Macromedia (I work in Macromedia ColdFusion Product Support).  Your mechanism is 
simple and requires less code, and it works well.  I believe Geoff Bowers wrote the 
other function (MXNA has a copyright notice with his name on it.), so he may just 
prefer the object/method approach.  

Cornel(1): Again, you may want to ping Geoff Bowers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) before using 
that exact code... but of course if you modified from the original, then ???...  

Cornel(2):   >>"The reason why I said there should be a 
            >> separate folder for css and one for 
            >> Language files is that in the current setup 
            >> the latest are kept with the latest version only 
            >> and we are working still with 2 versions, soon 
            >> to be 3 (Linux)versions"  

I think that there should only be one latest version.  Trying maintain more than one 
source tree will become very complicated very quickly.  I have not yet joined the 
CFXML_Blog team on SourceForge, but would like to.  At this time I haven't seen how 
the project is organized up there.

Giampaolo:  I would like to participate in the project development on SF.  Please tell 
me how.  Thanks!

-Steven Erat



-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan F. Hogan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [CFXML_Blog] Linux/Windows source tree (was RE: CFXML_blog on SourceForge)


What I meant was that the docs AFAIK do not contain documentation of things that you 
can do with java.io. I'm sure that MXNA is supported but, if it's not documented, I 
very much doubt that you will be able to get support for it.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steven Erat
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:00 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [CFXML_Blog] Linux/Windows source tree (was RE: CFXML_blog on SourceForge)


>> "On top of that it's a supported technique."

In what sense?  One implementation in CFML isn't necessarily 'supported' more than the 
other, at least not by Macromedia Product Support standards.


-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan F. Hogan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [CFXML_Blog] Linux/Windows source tree (was RE: CFXML_blog on
SourceForge)


On top of that it's a supported technique.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steven Erat
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 1:21 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [CFXML_Blog] Linux/Windows source tree (was RE: CFXML_blog on
SourceForge)


Agreed.  The old stand-by...

-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan F. Hogan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 1:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [CFXML_Blog] Linux/Windows source tree (was RE: CFXML_blog on
SourceForge)


Well I don't know about Macromedia, but 7 lines is better than 16 for me.

<cfscript>
if(Server.OS.Name contains 'Windows') {
        localVars.pathSep='\';
} else {
        localVars.pathSep='/';
}
</cfscript>