RE: [CFXML_Blog] Linux/Windows source tree (was RE: CFXML_blog on SourceForge)

[Steven Erat]

>> "On top of that it's a supported technique."

In what sense?  One implementation in CFML isn't necessarily 'supported' more than the 
other, at least not by Macromedia Product Support standards.  


-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan F. Hogan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [CFXML_Blog] Linux/Windows source tree (was RE: CFXML_blog on SourceForge)


On top of that it's a supported technique.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steven Erat
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 1:21 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [CFXML_Blog] Linux/Windows source tree (was RE: CFXML_blog on SourceForge)


Agreed.  The old stand-by...

-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan F. Hogan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 1:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [CFXML_Blog] Linux/Windows source tree (was RE: CFXML_blog on
SourceForge)


Well I don't know about Macromedia, but 7 lines is better than 16 for me.

<cfscript>
if(Server.OS.Name contains 'Windows') {
        localVars.pathSep='\';
} else {
        localVars.pathSep='/';
}
</cfscript>