Jared Chandler
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:06:42 -0800
It's really too bad that some of the workarounds for FB4 XML parsing couldn't be used to create a CF 5+ / XML blog variant. I love the idea of storing the content in static files, but having to use CFC's and CFMX is not always an easy price to pay. Maybe using WDDX? If the overhead of serialization could be compensated for by caching?
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Erat Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 3:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [cfxmlblog] error blog_beta3 Or possibly that you're on a server where createObject( ) was disabled in the security settings (typical of shared ISPs). What's the whole error message? It seems to be missing here. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jared Chandler Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 6:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [cfxmlblog] error blog_beta3 A number of possible things: You're not on a CFMX server (Which cfxml_blog requires) Application.cfm could not locate the links.cfc because the path is either wrong or changed. This is often the case when running the blog anywhere other than directly off the root. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of essie graham Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 2:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [cfxmlblog] error blog_beta3 What does this mean? The Error Occurred in C:\CFusionMX\wwwroot\cfxml_blog_beta3\Application.cfm: line 14 12 : request.kriptkey="cfxmlblog"; 13 : request.caching="cache"; 14 : request.blog=createobject("component","cfc.blog"); 15 : request.application_blog=createobject("component","cfc.application_blog" ); 16 : request.links=createobject("component","cfc.links"); Essie