Hi All Due to the lack of response, I'll assume there's no point in changing the code.
On 15/11/13 00:04, Richard Jones wrote: > Hi Ron, > > I didn't switch to CGI::Snapp as I embraced Dancer after playing with > Catalyst and finding it too much of a jump a the time. I wanted a more > modern approach to web app development, having use CGI::App for many > years, and Dancer came along at the right time. As you know D2 is a > re-write using Moo, so I think you're probably going in the right > direction. I now develop web apps exclusively with D2. > > On 14/11/2013 06:46, Ron Savage wrote: >> Hi All >> >> I've almost decided to switch the class builder in CGI::Snapp from >> Hash::FieldHash to Moo. >> >> The point of the switch is that sub-classes can then use Moo and Moo::Role. >> >> Just before I do I'd like to know how much trouble that's going to be >> for users (if any :-). >> > > -- Ron Savage http://savage.net.au/ ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
