Ok guys,
From the feedback received the release version we're targeting is:
0.1.0
I agree we keep the x.y.z versioning scheme standard for all releases
(will create a wiki to document that).
I'll proceed with the release preparation steps (@Florian: will ping
you for any help) and send a email to this list (and later to the
Incubator PMC [1] ) with the call for official vote.
HTH,
Gab
[1]
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
On Jun 8, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Goetz, Paul wrote:
+1
I agree to omit "alpha" or "beta" like labels. In worst case we
could go down to 0.0.1 ;o)
But I would prefer 0.1.0 as proposed by Florian.
-----Original Message-----
From: Florent Guillaume [mailto:f...@nuxeo.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 8. Juni 2010 11:31
To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
Agreed too.
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Jens Hübel <jhue...@opentext.com>
wrote:
I agree to Florian and the 0.1 version.
Jens
-------------
This message is sent from Blackberry.
----- Original Message -----
From: Florian Müller <fmuel...@opentext.com>
To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org <chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
Sent: Tue Jun 08 09:42:21 2010
Subject: RE: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
Hi,
I think the code is stable enough that we don't need an "alpha" or
"beta" label. On the other hand, we know that there will be API
changes in the (near?) future. So I suggest we start with the
version number 0.1.0.
@Gabriele: Let me know if I can support you with the release
preparation.
- Florian
-----Original Message-----
From: Gabriele Columbro [mailto:colum...@gmail.com]
Sent: Montag, 7. Juni 2010 22:37
To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: confluence-c...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
Hey guys,
for now I redeployed the latest OpenCMIS SNAPSHOT, will look tomorrow
into how we can practically (with the current Ant release process)
get
a release out there (also on the Apache Maven repo).
In such a case, what would be the version we would like to give to
this release?
E.g. which one of the following does better reflect the readiness of
our implementation:
- 1.0.0-alpha-1
- 1.0.0-beta-1
or do you have any other ideas in mind?
HTH,
Gab
On Jun 7, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Florian Müller
<fmuel...@opentext.com> wrote:
I think we should do some sort of release soon for the reasons you
have mentioned.
+1
What are the Apache rules for alpha and beta releases? I haven't
found much about
those types of releases on the Apache website.
From the ASF perspective anything that a project publishes beyond
the
development community is a release and should be done following the
relevant Apache policies. It's up to each community to decide what
to
put into a release and how to label it.
See http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html for
more
details about making releases at Apache.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
--
Eng. Gabriele Columbro
Alfresco Software, Ltd.
M: +31 (0)627 565 103
P: +39 320 161 28 46
D: +44 (0)1628 876 654
Skype: gabrielecolumbro
Blog: http://www.mindthegab.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mindthegabz
--
Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo
Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87
--
Eng. Gabriele Columbro
Alfresco Software, Ltd.
M: +31 (0)627 565 103
P: +39 320 161 28 46
D: +44 (0)1628 876 654
Skype: gabrielecolumbro
Blog: http://www.mindthegab.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mindthegabz
