[Cherokee] mime.conf vs. mime.types

[Mark Nipper]

        Just out of curiosity, is there any reason Cherokee uses
its own format in mime.conf instead of following the same format
which Apache and other Unix applications have settled upon using
in mime.types?  The reason being, the version of mime.types
shipped with Debian seems to be far more complete than the
mime.conf shipped with Cherokee.

        I'll assume here that people other than myself also have
a file /etc/mime.types (or some equivalent) even though they are
not necessarily running Debian.

-- 
Mark Nipper                                                e-contacts:
832 Tanglewood Drive                                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bryan, Texas 77802-4013                     http://nipsy.bitgnome.net/
(979)575-3193                      AIM/Yahoo: texasnipsy ICQ: 66971617

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GG/IT d- s++:+ a- C++$ UBL++++$ P--->+++ L+++$ !E---
W++(--) N+ o K++ w(---) O++ M V(--) PS+++(+) PE(--)
Y+ PGP t+ 5 X R tv b+++@ DI+(++) D+ G e h r++ y+(**)
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

---begin random quote of the moment---
cult: (n) A small, unpopular religion.
religion: (n) A large, popular cult.
----end random quote of the moment----
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokee@lists.alobbs.com
http://www.alobbs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee