cia_tradecraft  

[cia_tradecraft] RuleofLaw Murthacalls4Resignations BushSignsUnpassedBill UKNo2IranWar WhistleblowingACrime IranBourseDelay Searches Montagu StPat4 IntelExpose ChinaMilitaryInCentralAmerica

Stephen Calkins
Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:56:23 -0800

The President and the Courts March 20, 2006 
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/20/opinion/20mon1.html?th&emc=th
    Since the Republican majority has decided to allow President Bush to usurp 
Congress's role in matters of national security, the battle to save the 
constitutional balance of powers moves to the judiciary. If Congress wants to 
take the extreme step of suspending the Supreme Court's jurisdiction over 
habeas corpus, especially pending appeals, it must say so in unmistakable 
terms, which it has not done. Both the text and the legislative history of the 
Graham-Levin amendment demonstrate an intention to avoid touching pending 
cases. Moreover, the Constitution itself requires an "invasion" or a 
"rebellion" as a prerequisite for suspension of habeas corpus. It's hardly 
likely that the founding fathers intended to give Congress the right to 
eliminate judicial review during an ongoing international struggle against 
terrorism that may well go on for generations.
---------
Rep. Murtha says Rumsfeld, Cheney should resign 
March 19, 2006 
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Rep._Murtha_says_Rumsfeld_Cheney_should_0319.html
On Sunday's edition of Meet the Press with Tim Russert, Congressman John Murtha 
(D-PA) said that Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of Defense Donald 
Rumsfeld should resign for misdecisions in the war in Iraq. Excerpts from 
transcript: 
REP. MURTHA: Here, here’s what you should do, Mr. President. First of all, 
you should fire all the people who are responsible for that, which gives you 
international credibility. 
MR. RUSSERT: Including his secretary of defense? 
REP. MURTHA: Well, he, he should—well, let’s say he should offer his 
resignation... 
MR. RUSSERT: What about the vice president?   Should he offer his resignation? 
REP. MURTHA: Yeah. Well, certainly the vice president has been the primary 
force in running, running this war, and many of the mischaracterizations have 
come about. OK, I say fire some people, that’s the first thing. Anybody 
that’s been responsible, first of all, for the intelligence-gathering; second 
of all, for the characterization; and third of all, for the maintaining and 
running the war. For instance, from the national security office down to the 
secretary of defense’s office. I mean he’s got to make that decision. 
-------
Bush Signs Bill That Didn't Pass Congress Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com 
| March 18 2006
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/180306bushsigns.htm
    In an amazing development that has received almost no media attention, 
mainstream or alternative, President Bush again placed himself above the law 
and wilfully violated the Constitution by signing into law a bill that didn't 
pass both Houses of Congress. According to representative Henry Waxman, Bush 
signed into law a version of the Budget Reconciliation Act that didn't pass 
Congress. The discrepancy between the version Bush signed and the actual bill 
that passed equates to a value of $2 billion. Bush knew he was directly 
violating the Constitution and effectively acting as a despot because he 
received a call from the Speaker of the House before signing the bill, warning 
him that it had not been passed. The Presentment Clause of the U.S. 
Constitution states that before a bill can become law, it must be passed by 
both Houses of Congress. The reaction to this travesty needs to be a heck of a 
lot stronger than a Henry Waxman letter, impeachment proceedings on this alone 
need to be enacted before Bush starts rounding up his political enemies and 
shipping them off to Halliburton run internment camps.
----------
 Britain breaks with the US over Iran By Patrick Seale (excerpt) 
http://www.jang.com.pk and http://www.jang-group.com
DUBAI: Britain has told the United States that it will not take part in any 
armed action against Iran’s nuclear sites, according to diplomatic sources in 
London. Already facing huge public criticism for his participation in the Iraq 
war, Prime Minister Tony Blair is seeking to distance himself from America’s 
belligerent rhetoric towards Iran.
    Blair knows he would probably not survive the political storm if Britain 
joined in an attack on Iran. The concern in Whitehall, however, is that the 
Bush administration, egged on by Israel and its powerful friends in the United 
States, risks developing an unstoppable momentum towards war a war in which 
Britain clearly wants no part.
     There is a real fear that if Iran refuses to yield to pressure either by 
the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) or by the UN Security Council to 
which Iran was formally referred on March 8 then the US would be left with no 
other option than to strike. The US may indeed have boxed itself into a corner 
by its threats, which Iran has scornfully rejected.
     The view in Whitehall is that if America attacks Iran, it will have to do 
so alone or with Israel. In private discussions, British officials have made 
clear that any sort of military campaign against Iran would be "madness".
Despite its close alliance with the US, British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw 
has departed publicly from aggressive statements by senior US officials. He has 
ruled out military action by Britain against Iran as "inconceivable". clip..
----------
Criminalizing exposure of government wrongdoing
http://edit.store.yahoo.com/lib/realityzone/UFNcrimetoexposegov.mht
    This article ( 
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002157186
 ),  from Editor & Publisher reports that the proposed legislation for the 
so-called Terrorist Surveillance Act of 2006 to be introduced by Ohio Sen. 
Michael DeWine -- the principal purpose of which is to legalize the Bush 
Administration's illegal warrantless eavesdropping on Americans -- contains 
unprecedented provisions which create whole new categories of crimes designed 
to punish any future discussion of the President's eavesdropping activities, 
including by reporters:
   Reporters who write about government surveillance could be prosecuted under 
proposed legislation that would solidify the administration's eavesdropping 
authority, according to some legal analysts who are concerned about dramatic 
changes in U.S. law. The draft would add to the criminal penalties for anyone 
who "intentionally discloses information identifying or describing" the Bush 
administration's terrorist surveillance program or any other eavesdropping 
program conducted under a 1978 surveillance law. Under the boosted penalties, 
those found guilty could face fines of up to $1 million, 15 years in jail or 
both.
    Kate Martin, director of the Center for National Security Studies, said the 
measure is broader than any existing laws. She said, for example, the language 
does not specify that the information has to be harmful to national security or 
classified....excerpt from second link at top follows:
    "The bill would make it a crime to tell the American people that the 
president is breaking the law, and the bill could make it a crime for the 
newspapers to publish that fact," said Martin, a civil liberties advocate, Lucy 
Dalglish, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the 
Press, said the language would allow anyone — "if you read a story in the 
paper and pass it along to your brother-in-law" — to be prosecuted.  "As a 
practical matter, would they use this to try to punish any newspaper or any 
broadcast? It essentially makes coverage of any of these surveillance programs 
illegal," she said. "I'm sorry, that's just not constitutional." clip..
------
Launch of Iranian oil trading exchange unlikely to begin till at least midyear 
JOHN PARTRIDGE http://tinyurl.com/fhqty 
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20060314.RIRAN14/TPStory/Busine
    As the nuclear standoff pitting Iran against the West continues, some 
conspiracy theorists are more focused on another plan that the Middle Eastern 
nation is pursuing. But they are jumping the gun if they still figure Iran is 
within days of launching a new international oil exchange that would sell its 
own and other Middle Eastern oil producers' black gold in euros rather than 
U.S. dollars -- and which, the theory goes, could ultimately torpedo the 
greenback and the U.S. economy. Despite repeated reports over the past 18 
months or so that the planned bourse would finally open for business on March 
20, 2006 -- and go head to head with the New York Mercantile Exchange and the 
ICE Futures Exchange in London -- the start date has been postponed by at least 
several months and maybe more than a year.
    "In the middle of 2006, we are able to start the bourse," Mohammad 
Asemipur, special adviser on the project to Iran's Oil Minister, said when 
reached in Tehran. The plan is to trade petrochemical products first, with a 
crude oil contract coming last, a rollout that likely will take three years, he 
said.
   "You can rest assured, there will not be a crude oil contract, Gulf-based, 
in my opinion, within a year -- and that would be really pushing it," Mr. Cook, 
a former director of ICE's predecessor, the International Petroleum Exchange, 
said when reached in Scotland.
    Kamal Daneshyar, chairman of Iran's Majlis [parliamentary] Energy 
Commission reportedly told the Iranian Students News Agency in December that 
the exchange would at first operate in both dollars and euros, but gradually 
move to the European currency exclusively. He was also quoted as saying that 
this would enable Iran to get even with the U.S. for the economic damages it 
has inflicted on the Islamic republic.
     As for trading oil in euros, Mr. Cook said the Iranians likely would find 
it very difficult, at least in the next several years. "Basically, there aren't 
enough euros in circulation, and nor are there likely to be."
    A full challenge to the U.S. dollar as the world central bank reserve 
currency, Mr. Engdahl added later, would entail a "de facto declaration of war 
on the 'full-spectrum dominance' of the United States today," and that is 
something no country or group of countries is yet willing to launch.
---------
No Warrant.  No Problem. Bush breaking into homes. by vmckimmey Mar 17, 2006 
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/3/17/204235/876
    US News will publish a story that the Justice Department has authorized 
domestic search and seizure of homes and offices without warrant. The U.S. News 
article will be published on their site Saturday evening and will be the lead 
story in the magazine published Monday.Video on  unwarranted searches: 
http://www.canofun.com/cof/forums/thread-view 
--------
British Jewry Tried To Stop Zionism - Edwin Montagu By Henry Makow PhD 3-12-6 
http://www.savethemales.ca/001458.html
    Jews are taught that they are scapegoats but they don't learn it is the 
world government cabal that is using them. Using Zionist, Communist, Liberal, 
Feminist or Neo Con fronts, it dupes many Jews into advancing policies and 
beliefs that undermine society which is based on race, religion, nation and 
family. This gives the appearance Jews in general are responsible for the New 
World Order. It doesn't help that many Jews ignorantly deny this conspiracy 
exists and cry "anti-Semitism" every time a banker is criticized. It doesn't 
help that many have been conned into thinking they need Israel. In fact 
Israelis are being used to secure the Middle East for the Masonic British 
elite. The new Israeli Supreme Court building, funded and designed by 
Rothschilds, is replete with Masonic
symbolism. 
(http://www.thegoldenreport.com/asp/jerrysnewsmanager/anmviewer.asp?a=817&z=2) 
Some of the Rothschilds and their Jewish allies are part of this satanic 
conspiracy. But most Jews put their countries first, and would want no part of 
world government. Edwin Montagu, a gentle, sincere civilized man, is an example 
of such a Jew and an inspiration to us all. 
Related: "The Jewish Conspiracy is British Imperialism" 
http://www.savethemales.ca/000447.html
----------
St. Pat's 4 Letters to inmates
Daniel Burns - 13182052
Peter DeMott - 10891-083
 MDC BROOKLYN
 METROPOLITAN DETENTION CENTER
 P.O. BOX 329002
 BROOKLYN, NY  11232
Clare Grady 01264-052
 FEDERAL DETENTION CENTER
 P.O. BOX 562
 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106
Teresa Grady
Broome County Jail
P.O. Box 2047
Binghamton, NY.13902
--------
10-page summary by 20 journalists from "Into the Buzzsaw" compiled Kristina 
Borjesson www.WantToKnow.info (excerpt)
    John Kelly is first author with Phillip Wearne of Tainting Evidence: Inside 
the Scandals at the FBI Crime Lab, which was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize. He 
is the former editor and senior writer for the National Reporter, a publication 
reporting on the CIA. According to the Central Intelligence Agency itself, as 
reported by the House Intelligence Committee, "The Clandestine Service of the 
CIA is the only part of the Intelligence Community, indeed of government, where 
hundreds of employees on a daily basis are directed to break extremely serious 
laws in countries around the world. A safe estimate is that several hundred 
times every day (easily 100,000 times a year), officers engage in highly 
illegal activities." (pp. 115)
     Government documents, including CIA reports, show that the CIA's crimes 
include terrorism, assassination, torture, and systematic violations of human 
rights. The report notes that CIA personnel are "directed" to commit crimes. 
(p. 117)
    CIA documents show that the CIA created, trained, and armed death squads in 
Guatemala as part of its coup and destabilization of the democratically elected 
government in 1954. In Honduras, the CIA's own inspector general reported that 
paid CIA assets at the highest level created and ran a death squad which, 
according to the Honduran government, murdered at least 184 people. The Senate 
Intelligence Committee proposed a bill that would immunize CIA offenders who 
violate treaties and international agreements while following orders. The bill 
passed both houses of Congress and was signed into law by President Bill 
Clinton on December 27, 2000. (pp.117-118)
      Former CIA General Counsel Sporkin revealed that the CIA, not the 
president, creates findings to fit preordained covert operations and sends the 
findings to the president for his signature. (p. 126, 127)
    ABC hired me to help produce a story about an investment firm in Hawaii 
that was heavily involved with the CIA. I had
earlier provided the same story to BBC's Newsnight, which aired it. The story 
was fully documented, and nobody, including the CIA, was able to disprove the 
charges. Part of the report charged that the CIA had plotted to assassinate an 
American, Ron Rewald, the president of [the investment firm]. Scott Barnes who 
said on camera that the CIA had asked him to kill Rewald.  [CIA Director 
William] Casey called ABC Chairman Leonard H. Goldenson. The call led to three
meetings between ABC officials and Stanley Sporkin, CIA general counsel. On 
November 21, 1984, despite all the documented evidence presented in the 
program, Peter Jennings reported that ABC could no longer substantiate the
charges, and that "We have no reason to doubt the CIA's denial." He presented 
no evidence supporting the CIA's position. 
   That same day, the CIA filed a formal complaint with the FCC, written by 
Sporkin and signed by [CIA Director] Casey, charging that ABC had "deliberately 
distorted" the news. Casey asked that ABC be stripped of its TV and radio 
licenses.   
    During this time, Capital Cities Communications was maneuvering to buy ABC. 
[CIA Director] Casey was one of the founders of Cap Cities. Cap Cities bought 
ABC for $3.5 billion, which was called a "bargain rate" by the trade media. 
Besides Casey, two other founders of Cap Cities had extensive ties to the 
intelligence community. Within months, the entire investigative unit [of ABC] 
was dispersed, and the commentator on the Rewald program was assigned to 
covering beauty pageants. Needless to say, my contract was not renewed. (pp. 
132, 122)For Mr. Kelly's book Tainting Evidence: Inside the Scandals at the FBI 
Crime Lab,see amazon.com. (Steve's Note This means that ABC is a CIA run media 
source.)
--  --  --
Gary Webb was an investigative reporter. He won a 1990 Pulitzer Prize, received 
the 1997 Media Hero award, and in 1996 was named Journalist of the Year. In 
1996, he wrote a series of stories, entitled Dark Alliance. A CIA-linked drug 
and stolen car network provided weapons and tons of high-grade, dirt cheap 
cocaine to the very person who spread crack through LA and from there into the 
hinterlands. We have compelling evidence that the kingpins of this cocaine ring 
enjoyed a unique relationship with the US government that has continued to this 
day. (pp.145-146) The Mercury News officially backed away from Dark Alliance, 
after that. (p. 153) 
    The CIA's knowledge and involvement had been far greater than I'd ever 
imagined. Agents and officials of the DEA had protected the traffickers from 
arrest, something I'd not been allowed to print. At the start of the Contra 
war, the CIA and Justice Department had worked out an unusual agreement that 
permitted the CIA not to have to report allegations of drug trafficking by its 
agents to the Justice Department. (p. 154) Do we have a free press today? Sure 
we do. It's free to report all the sex scandals it wants, all the stock market 
news we can handle, every new health fad that comes down the pike, and every 
celebrity marriage or divorce that happens. But when it comes to the real down 
and dirty stuff-stories like
Tailwind, the October Surprise, the El Mozote massacre, corporate corruption, 
or CIA involvement in drug trafficking-that's where we begin to see the limits 
of our freedoms. In today's mass media environment, sadly, such stories are not 
even open for discussion. Back in 1938, when fascism was sweeping Europe, 
legendary investigative reporter George Seldes observed that "it is possible to 
fool all the people all the time-when government and press cooperate." 
Unfortunately, we have reached that point. (p. 156) The book "Dark Alliance" at 
amazon.com Steve's Note: Gary Webb continued to do exposes on the CIA and was 
found with two gun shots in his head a year ago,  (labeled a 'suicide'). 
--  --  --
Michael Levine is a 25-year veteran of the DEA turned best-selling author and 
journalist. 
    The Chang Mai factory the CIA prevented me from destroying was the source 
of massive amounts of heroin being smuggled into the US in the bodies and body 
bags of GIs killed in Vietnam. (p. 165) My unit, the Hard Narcotics Smuggling 
Squad, was charged with investigating all heroin and cocaine smuggling through 
the Port of New York. My unit became involved in investigating every major 
smuggling operation known to law enforcement. We could not avoid witnessing the 
CIA protecting major drug dealers. Not a single important source in Southeast 
Asia was ever indicted by US law enforcement. This was no accident. Case after 
case was killed by CIA and State Department intervention and there wasn't a 
damned thing we could do about it. CIA-owned airlines like Air America were 
being used to ferry drugs throughout Southeast Asia, allegedly to support our 
"allies." CIA banking operations were used to launder drug money. (pp. 165, 166)
In 1972, I was assigned to assist in a major international drug case involving 
top Panamanian government officials who were using diplomatic passports to 
smuggle large quantities of heroin and other drugs into the US. Manuel Noriega, 
head of the CIA, George HW Bush authorized a salary for Manuel Noriega as a CIA 
asset, while the dictator was listed in as many as 40 DEA computer files as a 
drug dealer. (pp. 166, 167)
The Mujihadeen in Afghanistan, the Bolivian cocaine cartels, the top levels of 
Mexican government, Nicaraguan Contras, Colombian drug dealers and politicians, 
and others, were allowed to flow unimpeded drugs into the US. On July 17, 1980, 
drug traffickers actually took control of a nation. Bolivia at the time [was] 
the source of virtually 100% of the cocaine
entering the US. CIA-recruited mercenaries and drug traffickers unseated 
Bolivia's democratically elected president, a leftist whom the US government 
didn't want in power. Immediately after the coup, cocaine production increased 
massively, until it soon outstripped supply. This was the true beginning of the 
cocaine and crack "plague." (pp. 167, 168)
    The CIA along with the State and Justice Departments had to combine forces 
to protect their drug-dealing assets by destroying a DEA investigation. How do 
I know? I was the inside source. I sat down at my desk in the American embassy 
and wrote the kind of letter that I never myself imagined ever writing. I 
detailed three pages typewritten on official US embassy stationary-enough 
evidence of my charges to feed a wolf pack of investigative journalists. I also 
expressed my willingness to be a quotable source. I addressed it directly to 
Strasser and Rohter, care of Newsweek. Two sleepless weeks later, I was still 
sitting in my embassy office staring at the phone. Three weeks later, it rang. 
It was DEA's internal security. They were calling me to notify me that I was 
under investigation. I had been falsely accused of everything from 
black-marketing to having sex with a married female DEA agent. The 
investigation would wreak havoc with my life
for the next four years. (pp. 168-171)
    An associate of mine was sent into Honduras to open a DEA office in 
Tegucigalpa. Within months he had documented as much as 50 tons of cocaine 
being smuggled into the US by Honduran military people who were supporting the 
Contras. What was the DEA response? They closed the office. (p. 175)
    Sometime in 1990, US Customs intercepted a ton of cocaine being smuggled 
through Miami International Airport. A Customs and DEA investigation quickly 
revealed that the smugglers were the Venezuelan National Guard headed by 
General Guillen, a CIA "asset" who claimed that he had been operating under CIA 
orders and protection. The CIA soon admitted that this was true.  If the CIA is 
good at anything, it is the complete control of American mass media. The New 
York Times had the story almost immediately in 1990 and did not print it until 
1993. It finally became news that was "fit to print" when the Times learned 
that 60 Minutes also had the story and was actually going to run it. (pp. 188, 
189)
    In the World Trade Center bombing in 1993, the FBI had a paid informant, 
Emad Salem, who had infiltrated the bombers and had told the FBI of their plans 
to blow up the twin towers. Without notifying the NYPD or anyone else, an FBI 
supervisor "fired" Salem, who was making $500 a week for his work. After the 
bomb went off, the FBI hired Salem back and paid him $1.5 million to help them 
track down the bombers. But that's not all the FBI missed. When they finally 
did catch the actual bomber, Ramzi Yousef (a man trained with CIA funds during 
the Russia-Afghanistan war), the FBI found information on his personal computer 
about plans to use hijacked American jetliners as fuel-laden missiles. The FBI 
ignored this information, too.  Learn about Mr. Levine's books and radio show:  
http://www.expertwitnessradio.org.
Steve's Note: According to the NY Times report, (during the 1993 WTC bombing 
trial), Salem told investigators and the court that the FBI was involved in the 
bombing. Ron Kuby, one of the defendant's attorneys in the  case stated: "The 
article on the FBl being involved in  the World Trade Center bombing actually 
understated  the evidence. The informer, Emad  Salem, is actually on tape 
saying that he built the  bomb that ultimately blew up the World Trade Center." 
 "In addition, we have received  information that he was visually observed at 
the scene  of the bombing shortly after the bombing took place.  Shortly after 
that, he was admitted to the hospital,  suffering from an ear problem that was 
consistent with  exposure to blast. The mastermind is the government of  the 
United States. It was a phony,  government engineered conspiracy to begin with. 
It  would never have amounted to anything had the  government not planned it." 
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/adam.htm Famous civil rights lawyer William 
Kunstler died the evening after this information was released in court, (of a 
supposed heart attack), delaying the trail and suppressing the information that 
Kunstler had uncovered concerning the FBI's involvement.  
--  --  --
Pierre Salinger announced to the world on November 8, 1996, that he'd received 
documents from French intelligence proving that a US Navy missile had 
accidentally downed [TWA Flight 800]. That same day, FBI's Jim Kallstrom called 
a press conference to deny Salinger's allegations. [At the press conference,] 
Kallstrom rattled off a prepared speech, and then it was time for questions. A 
man raised his hand and asked why the Navy was involved in the recovery and 
investigation while a possible suspect. Kallstrom's response was immediate; 
"Remove him!" he yelled. Two men leapt over to the questioner and grabbed him 
by the arms. There was a momentary chill in the air after the guy had been 
dragged out of the room. Kallstrom acted as if nothing had happened. (pp. 290, 
291) A few weeks after the FBI's visit to CBS, I received my walking papers. 
Law enforcement consultant Paul Ragonese eventually got his walking papers, 
too. Ragonese was replaced by none other than the FBI's TWA 800 task force 
chief, James Kallstrom. (p. 307)
Ms. Borjesson co-hosts WBAI's Expert Witness Radio Program at 
http://www.expertwitnessradio.org.
--------------
Peoplenomics 3/20/06  Post at Yahooogroups (excerpt)
   One of our correspondents who does something semi-military and writes in 
from various hotspots (Afghanistan and Iraq's green zone among only places) who 
calls himself "The Wandering Texan" is back on US soil and wonders why no one 
is paying attention to Chinas take over of many things south of us: "Just got 
back to the US. Before leaving the Mideast an old government friend suggested I 
make a pass through some of our old stomping grounds in Central and South 
America. I must say I was a bit taken back by what I found. There is a recent 
and quite strong Chinese military presence in all of the region. Advisers are 
everywhere, and a large number of former allies are now going to China for 
military training. I saw a large number of Chinese men and equipment in 
southern Mexico. There is Chinese military all over Panama. As you might guess 
there are starting to provide their Latin friends with Chinese equipment. clip..



*** DO NOT POST ILLEGAL INFORMATION. Identifying agents is a criminal offense. 
Please also respect the rights of other individuals.

*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. CIA Tradecraft is 
making it available without profit to CIA Tradecraft Yahoo! Groups members who 
have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their 
efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement 
organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil 
liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit 
research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 
'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the 
U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes 
of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the 
copyright owner.

For more information go to:
http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia_tradecraft/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


  • [cia_tradecraft] RuleofLaw Murthacalls4Resignations BushSignsUnpassedBill UKNo2IranWar WhistleblowingACrime IranBourseDelay Searches Montagu StPat4 IntelExpose ChinaMilitaryInCentralAmerica Stephen Calkins