Chuck, Tim:

Thank you both for the help. I'll give these ideas a try and see how they shake 
out.

The "module" command is a new one to me. Looks like it can be helpful for a 
variety of tasks.

I do still wish cmake had a method to select a tool family that was:

1) Succinct (i.e. short to type)
2) Explicit (i.e. actually present as argument to cmake, not environment based.)
3) Workable by default (i.e. If tools are installed in default location, no 
need to modify my CMakeLists unless I actually need to change flags.)

Is this worth filing as a feature request? If so, any suggestions about how to 
word this?

Thanks again,
Waffle


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [CMake] Idomatic cmake: Supporting gcc, icc, and clang with custom 
flags for each?
Local Time: May 17, 2016 1:49 PM
UTC Time: May 17, 2016 5:49 PM
From: tim.gallag...@gatech.edu
To: chuck.atk...@kitware.com,wafflec...@protonmail.com,cmake@cmake.org



We do what Chuck showed inside our CMakeLists for different flags for each 
compiler.





To answer your other question, I prefer to use the shorter form:





> CC=icc FC=ifort CXX=icpc cmake /path/to/source





which sets the CC, FC and CXX environment variables only for that ccmake 
command without changing them in my global environment (using bash shell, it 
may work in others also). Once CMake has set the compilers, it doesn't change 
them so future calls can just be





> cmake ./





Usually when I have to do a lot of compiler jockeying, I set up the module 
system (common on HPC's to handle different software stacks) so I can just do 
something like:





> module load intel-compilers


> cmake /path/to/source





> module swap intel-compilers gnu-compilers


> cmake /path/to/source





and so on.





Tim







------


From: CMake <cmake-boun...@cmake.org> on behalf of TCW via CMake 
<cmake@cmake.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 1:21 PM
To: Chuck Atkins
Cc: cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] Idomatic cmake: Supporting gcc, icc, and clang with custom 
flags for each?


Hi Chuck,

Interesting. The flat list is not so bad i guess. (As an include.) I was 
thinking that cmake might support some kind of hierarchical platform definition 
system like Qt's qmake. (Not that it's without foibles either.)

On the compiler selection question I'm still wondering if normative cmake usage 
really is, for example:

cmake -D CMAKE_C_COMPILER=/opt/path/to/icc -D 
CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=/opt/path/to/icpc ../path/to/src

That is would be as opposed to the much shorter (but purely imagineary):
cmake --tools=intel_16.0 ../path/to/src
or, cmake --tools=gcc_5.3 ../path/to/src
or, cmake --tools=gcc_6.1 ../path/to/src

Where "intel_16.0" and the like map to some locally defined path (and perhaps 
also flag) definitions.

Do folks really use the long form above? (perhaps wrapping it in a shell script 
or the like?)

As someone very to to cmake, I wonder if I'm missing some key insight in to 
normal cmake workflow, or if this kind of compiler selection is, in fact, rare 
enough to not be cleanly supported.

Thank you,
Waffle



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [CMake] Idomatic cmake: Supporting gcc, icc, and clang with custom 
flags for each?
Local Time: May 17, 2016 9:47 AM
UTC Time: May 17, 2016 1:47 PM
From: chuck.atk...@kitware.com
To: wafflec...@protonmail.com
CC: cmake@cmake.org














Hi TCW,
A typical approach for this is in the top level CMakeLists.txt to have:

include(CompilerFlags)

And then you can isolate the detection and specialization logic in a separate 
CompilerFlags.cmake:

if(CMAKE_COMPILER_IS_GNUC)
set(CMAKE_C_FLAGS "${CMAKE_C_FLAGS" -extra --gcc-options")
elseif(CMAKE_C_COMPILER_ID MATCHES "Intel")
set(CMAKE_C_FLAGS "${CMAKE_C_FLAGS" -extra --icc-options")
elseif(CMAKE_C_COMPILER_ID MATCHES "PGI)
set(CMAKE_C_FLAGS "${CMAKE_C_FLAGS" -extra --pgcc-options")
elseif(MSVC)
if(MSVC_VERSION GREATER_THAN 1700)
...
elseif(...)
...
endif()
endif()

And then similarly for C++.












- Chuck


On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:49 AM, TCW via CMake <cmake@cmake.org> wrote:

Hello all,

On linux, what's the correct way to support building with several different C 
compilers, each with some extra compiler-specifc flags for Debug and Release 
modes? (Eventually I'll need to add Visual Studio on Windows too. )

For now, I'm following what's mentioned in the cmake FAQ and using CXX=/blah 
cmake, etc.

(From: [ 
https://cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ#How_do_I_use_a_different_compiler.3F](https://cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ#How_do_I_use_a_different_compiler.3F))

But this is getting quite cumbersome as I'm experimenting with different flags 
for each compiler, and I'd rather avoid polluting my fairly clean CMakeLists 
file with a bunch of if/else branches to set flags.

In the cmake manual I see reference to a -DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE option, but 
this seems designed for embedded cross-compile scenarios. (Is that right?)

(From: [ 
https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/manual/cmake-toolchains.7.html](https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/manual/cmake-toolchains.7.html))

Basically, I'd like to succinctly choose among a set of (slightly) customized 
compiler choices.

For modern cmake usage what is the correct method? Can anybody point me to a 
well done example for a simple case like this?

Thank you!

tcw
--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: [ 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ](http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ)

Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more 
information on each offering, please visit:

CMake Support: [ 
http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html](http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html)
CMake Consulting: [ 
http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html](http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html)
CMake Training Courses: [ 
http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html](http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html)

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at [ 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html](http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html)

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake
-- 

Powered by www.kitware.com

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more 
information on each offering, please visit:

CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Reply via email to