On 10/24/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > unless some one beats me to it, once the patch is available i'll add > myself to the dev list and review (as time permits).
Patches submitted. > > While I'm at it would it be desirable to transition to the privately > > head lock idiom > it might (however) stop a user doing something equivalent through > carelessness or naivity. so probably worth doing. would need to add a > note to the documentation since this would change the semantics. > opinions? I have a number of pending patches: http://tinyurl.com/cauwd that I'd like to see commited or rejected as I'm starting to feel no one cares about them and it's becoming a pain to maintain my own patched pool version. After that I'd be willing to implement the transition to the private lock idiom. -- Sandy McArthur "Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have ... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases." -- Thomas Jefferson --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
