On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 3:04 PM, David Wu <lightvec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To some degree this maybe means Leela is insufficiently explorative in > cases like this, but still, why does the policy net not put H5 more than > 1.03%. After all, it's vastly more likely than 1% that that a good player > will see the ladder works here and try escaping in this position. I think it's likely that the ladder is actually the first thing that Leela considered. My guess is that it put a penalty on the move after misreading the ladder.
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
