conlawprof  

Branti / Rutan / Pickering and nonreappointment of theatre board member

Volokh, Eugene
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:50:38 -0800

Any thoughts on whether there is a First Amendment problem here?  I take it in 
the wake of Rutan, it's clear that Branti and Pickering apply to hiring and 
rehiring decisions as well.  I think some lower courts also hold that these 
cases apply to volunteers and not just to employees.  The tough question, I 
think, is what sorts of politician-appointed offices are subject to First 
Amendment constraints, and for which ones the appointing official has carte 
blanche (at least where the First Amendment is concerned); I'd love to hear 
what people think about this, and the other questions as well:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/01/20/BA151BKA16.DTL&type=printable


A $26,000 contribution to the initiative that banned same-sex marriage in 
California appears to have cost a 96-year-old former Mormon temple president 
his seat on the board that oversees Oakland's historic Paramount Theatre.

Amid rising criticism from the gay community, Mayor Ron Dellums said Tuesday 
that he was putting on hold the reappointment of Lorenzo Hoopes, most likely 
signaling an end to Hoopes' 30-plus years on the Paramount board.

"The community is asking us to reconsider, and that is what we are going to 
do," mayoral spokesman Paul Rose said.

Hoopes, a past president of the Mormon temple in Oakland as well as a former 
Safeway executive, has been on the Paramount board since before the downtown 
theater was restored in the early 1970s.

Even if Dellums had gone forward with Hoopes' renomination, there was little 
chance the City Council would have approved it, council President Jane Brunner 
said.

"A lot of us don't think that he represents our thinking in Oakland," Brunner 
said....
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Conlawprof@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/conlawprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.