conlawprof  

RE: Outsourcing Legislation from WH to the House of Representatives

Crowley, Donald
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:54:44 -0800

It is hard to know what the public knows about the health care
legislation.  The House bill which included a public option polled much
better than the version the Senate passed.  Thus Cantor's point about
"outsourcing" the bill to the "left wing" agenda of the House which is
supposedly outside the mainstream is pretty clearly untrue.  Larry seems
to implicitly notice this by acknowledging the main "deal cutting"
occurred in the Senate and was an attempt to get "centrist" Democrats on
board.  These deals (necessary to break the Republican filibuster) made
the bill worse. The last time we were here (1993) the Republican
complaint was the White House tried to write the legislation instead of
letting Congress do it.  Now the complaint is that Obama outsourced the
legislation to the House.  I'm with Steve---Cantor is just engaging in
cynical posturing.

 

Don

 

From: conlawprof-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:conlawprof-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Rosenthal,
Lawrence
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 12:58 PM
To: Steven Jamar
Cc: Conlawprof@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: Outsourcing Legislation from WH to the House of
Representatives

 

This strikes me as quite unfair criticism of Rep. Cantor.   In context,
it seems clear to me that his point is not that President Obama did
something improper by leaving the crafting of the health care
legislation to Congress, but that he took a course of action that was
politically imprudent, and which reflects poorly on the President's
judgment.  Surely he is correct on that point.  Congressional support
for any major piece of legislation is sure to collapse if it becomes
sufficiently unpopular, and in that respect, if the President chose to
embrace health care reform as his own political priority (as he did), it
would have been politically prudent to ensure that the bill did not
become so laden with special interest provisions that it would become a
political liability.  That, of course, is precisely what happened to the
bill (although the deal-cutting actually seems to have been much more
problematic in the Senate than the House).  In retrospect, this seems to
me to be an entirely fair criticism of the President's approach.  

 

Larry Rosenthal

Chapman University School of Law 

 

From: conlawprof-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:conlawprof-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Steven Jamar
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 12:37 PM
Cc: Conlawprof@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: Outsourcing Legislation from WH to the House of
Representatives

 

Paul,

 

I'm sure Cantor knows -- and that Darrell's point is correct -- Cantor
is engaging in cynical campaigning (is there any other kind?) to
undermine Obama.  If Cantor were Majority Whip, I'm sure we'd find him
complaining about Obama trying to usurp the proper constitutional
function of the House by being too involved in the legislation process.

 

It is just substantively nonsense, cynically done for political gain.

 

Of course the President has a huge role to play in legislation --
including directing it.  And some Presidents (e.g., Bush II, Lyndon
Johnson) play that role much more vigorously than others (Eisenhower,
Carter, even Reagan).

 

No.  He understands what he is saying, why he is saying it, and is
clearly doing what has become (and has been in the past) the norm for
some politicians -- make points, not policy.

 

Steve

 

 

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Paul Finkelman
<paul.finkel...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Last time I knew the job of the House of Representatives WAS to write
legislation.  I guess Cantor does not understand Article I of the US
Constitution.  It is partisan, but sadly, it is also incredibly dumb

 

----
Paul Finkelman
President William McKinley Distinguished Professor of Law
Albany Law School
80 New Scotland Avenue
Albany, NY 12208

518-445-3386 (p)
518-445-3363 (f)

 

paul.finkel...@albanylaw.edu

 

www.paulfinkelman.com

 

 

________________________________

From: "Miller, Darrell (mille2di)" <mille...@ucmail.uc.edu>
To: "Conlawprof@lists.ucla.edu" <Conlawprof@lists.ucla.edu>
Sent: Fri, January 29, 2010 2:43:38 PM
Subject: Outsourcing Legislation from WH to the House of Representatives

 

>From Politico, full link here:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/32192_Page2.html

 

Cantor criticized Obama for last year's "outsourcing of the legislative
activity from the White House to Nancy Pelosi here in this House," which
he said has resulted in "a bill shift and an agenda shift way to the
left and outside the mainstream of this country."

 

To me, this seems like a fairly gross exploitation of people's ignorance
of our system of divided government, and an indictment of partisan
gerrymandering which makes this kind of statement politically resonant. 

 

Darrell A.H. Miller 

Assistant Professor of Law

University of Cincinnati College of Law

PO Box 210040

Clifton Avenue & Calhoun Street

Cincinnati, OH 45221-0040
v: 513-556-0133
f: 513-556-1236
e: darrell.mil...@uc.edu <mailto:darrell.mil...@uc.edu>  

 

faculty page:

http://www.law.uc.edu/faculty/profiles/miller.php

 

SSRN:  

http://ssrn.com/author=1107305 <http://ssrn.com/author=1107305>  

 

 


_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Conlawprof@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/conlawprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly
or wrongly) forward the messages to others.




-- 
Prof. Steven Jamar
Howard University School of Law
Associate Director, Institute of Intellectual Property and Social
Justice (IIPSJ) Inc.

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Conlawprof@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/conlawprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.