On 2013-10-01 08:51, Watson Ladd wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 2:21 PM, James A. Donald <jam...@echeque.com
<mailto:jam...@echeque.com>> wrote:
Weaker in ways that the NSA has examined, and the people that
chose the winning design have not.
This isn't true: Keccak's designers proposed a wide range of capacity
parameters for different environments.
This is not Keccak's design.
This a new unexamined design somewhat resembling Keccak's design.
Or perhaps Keccak's design somewhat resembled what the NSA had already
decided to do.
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
