Hi! On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 12:42:47PM +0200, Tim Janik wrote: > On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Stefan Westerfeld wrote: > > >Testmail. > > is there really a point in keeping this mailing list alive? >
Well: I hope that in some time, PortAudio (or some other solution) takes the role of an abstraction for audio I/O, so that applications, such as BEAST, don't need to deal any longer with different sound servers / sound APIs. But I am still wondering (for instance): why doesn't BEAST work with polypaudio? Although there was a PortAudio driver for polypaudio in development, the PortAudio CVS doesn't yet have it. The same could be said for MAS, ESD, aRts and maybe others. As long as I don't see PortAudio (or something else) addressing the problem that CSL should have been addressing, I am not sure that it is a good idea to give up CSL entierly. PortAudio also may need additional interfaces for mainloop abstraction and other stuff we have in CSL, but not in PortAudio. Cu... Stefan -- Stefan Westerfeld, Hamburg/Germany, http://space.twc.de/~stefan _______________________________________________ Csl mailing list Csl@space.twc.de http://space.twc.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csl
