ctrl  

[CTRL] Fwd: [CIA-DRUGS] Re: September 11, Islamic Jihad or another Northwoods?

RoadsEnd
Fri, 03 Jan 2003 10:39:09 -0800

-Caveat Lector-


<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "tim_howells_1000 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,  I realize I'm preaching to the choir here, but what 
> I'm really after is some constructive criticism.  I'm trying 
> to put together the ideal post to convince someone who has 
> to this point bought into the "official story" that September 11 
> was a black op perpetrated by elements of our own government.  
> This is already much longer than I would like, and I've had 
> to leave out a lot of very important stuff.  Suggestions welcome.
> 

This is excellent work, Tim.  Extremely comprehensive, which is 
paramount in presenting one's argument for the government's 
involvement (or negligence) into September 11.

Thanks for sharing and allowing for suggestions.

A few things came to mind when reading your references to the CIA's 
involvement and the FBI's thwarting of key investigations.  I believe 
the inclusion of certain testimony (one of which I believe you 
alluded to) of two more people might help make your case for 
government complicity.  Michael Springmann and Robert Wright offered 
some very good testimony in the wake of the 9-11 investigation.

Springmann, a former employee of the Visa Express program at the 
CIA's consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, gave a speech at the June 
10, 2002 press conference of UnansweredQuestions.org, in which he 
chronicled the CIA's recruitment of terrorists for training within 
the United States.

The following are experts from his speech:

"...I used to be in charge of the Visa Section at the CIA's consulate 
at Jeddah, the principle city of the Hejahs in Western Saudi Arabia. 
There, for a year and a half, I issued visas to terrorists recruited 
by the CIA and its asset, Osama Bin Laden. At the time I thought it 
was basically visa fraud. Somebody was paying $2500 bribes to State 
Department officials. I was ordered by these same high State 
Department officials to issue the visas, to shut up, to do my job and 
ask no questions. 

(...)

"I tried mightily for several years to find out what had happened to 
me, and the Freedom of Information Act requests were being 
stonewalled on the basis of national security, I ran across a 
journalist, Joe Trento. And about the same time I ran across two 
people, one of who was a government official and the other was a 
person attached to a local university here in Washington. All three 
confirmed that what I was protesting was not visa fraud but people 
being rounded up by the agency and Osama Bin Laden to come to the 
United Sates for training as terrorists to be sent to fight in the 
war against the then Soviet Union in Afghanistan. They used roughly a 
million dollars in liquor sales a year from the consulate in Jeddah 
to fund this. And you might ask, well, as the Washington Legal Times 
did, that was then, this is now, fifteen years later. Well, from what 
I read in the Los Angeles Times, fifteen of the nineteen people who 
allegedly flew airplanes into buildings in the United States got 
their visas from the same CIA consulate at Jeddah." 
http://www.unansweredquestions.org/transcript.php#mikes

Was it simply a case of blowback or government complicity?  You be 
the judge, however, the methods by which the hijackers were allowed 
to slip into the United States should not be overlooked.  Either way 
you spin it, it was at CIA's behest that fifteen of the nineteen 
hijackers were allowed to carry out one of the most heinous attacks 
(to date) on American soil.  

Former FBI agent Robert Wright's testimony is as equally damning 
as Coleen Rowley's.  Like Rowley, Wright's superiors also thwarted 
his investigation into the terrorist trail.  One of the most -- or 
what should have been the most -- damaging speeches made post 9-11, 
was Wright's public apology, via Judicial Watch, to the families of 
the 9-11 victims for FBI's failure to stop the attacks.  This 
amounted to a blatant admission on his part that the FBI was aware of 
the plot and had the ability to stop it, yet did nothing.

In a recent ABC 20/20 interview, Wright, along with fellow agent John 
Vincent, revealed even more startling details of his investigation.  
One of the very people he was told to back off from investigating 
after the 1998 US Embassy bombings in Africa, a Saudi businessman by 
the name of Yassin al-Kadi, turned up as key financier in bin-Laden's 
operations after 9-11.

"One month after the attacks, the U.S. government officially 
identified al-Kadi — the same man the FBI had ordered Wright and 
Vincent to leave alone years earlier — as one of bin Laden's 
important financiers." 
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/FBI_whistleblowers0
21219.html

A recent December 6, 2002, raid on a computer software company by the 
name of Ptech led authorities back to al-Kadi.  Al-Kadi was a silent 
partner in Ptech and provided $5 million of his own money to start up 
the company back in 1994.  Ironically enough, among the many Ptech 
clients were the FBI itself, along with the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. 
Postal Service, the Naval Air Systems Command, the Federal Aviation 
Administration, and NATO.  

"The company provides computer software to the FBI and other key 
federal agencies, which means al-Kadi and his employees could have 
had access to some of the government's most sensitive secrets." 
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/FBI_whistleblowers0
21219.html

So, not only did the FBI prevent Wright from investigating al-Kadi, 
but they allowed al-Kadi access to potentially sensitive government 
databases including their own.  Again, does this equate to gross 
negligence or complicity?  You be the judge, but as you so duly 
noted that while "Atta and the other hijackers operated quite openly 
in the United States, as if they enjoyed guaranteed protection," 
others were afforded access to sensitive government data bases.  
This not only sounds like protection, but it sounds like permission.

Also interesting to note: the Visa Express program described above in 
Springmann's testimony is now defunct; Ptech was raided by Homeland 
Security just days after the passing of the bill.  Blatantly overt 
attempts like these by the US government to cover their ties to key 
9-11 players also lends support to the theory that they were in no 
way taken by surprise on September 11, 2001.  It's obvious they not 
only knew of the plot, but knew where to send the cleaners after 
legislation was in place granting them sweeping powers to cover their 
tracks.

Another case of promotion within the FBI of "those responsible for 
thwarting the investigations that could have prevented the horrific 
events of September 11" is cited in the same interview with agent 
Wright:

"Perhaps most astounding of the many mistakes, according to Flessner 
and an affidavit filed by Wright, is how an FBI agent named Gamal 
Abdel-Hafiz seriously damaged the investigation. Wright says Abdel-
Hafiz, who is Muslim, refused to secretly record one of al-Kadi's 
suspected associates, who was also Muslim. Wright says Abdel-Hafiz 
told him, Vincent and other agents that 'a Muslim doesn't record 
another Muslim.'

(...)

"Far from being reprimanded, Abdel-Hafiz was promoted to one of the 
FBI's most important anti-terrorism posts, the American Embassy in 
Saudi Arabia, to handle investigations for the FBI in that Muslim 
country." 
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/FBI_whistleblowers0
21219.html

I would also like to add just a minor caution in reporting the 
Moussaoui case.  The fact he was arrested a month before September 
11th, was neither due to "luck" nor alert actions of the flight 
instructors.  A lot of what's being reported about the Moussaoui case 
is disinformation designed to cover the fact that the FBI knew who he 
was, and kept track of him, from the second he stepped onto US soil.  
I wholeheartedly believe this is the real reason for the FBI's 
denial of Rowely's access to Moussaoui's hard drive -- it would 
reveal the fact they were tracking the activities of many of the 
hijackers before 9-11 and knew of the plot.

Consider the defendant's testimony:

"I have a compelling reason to say that this government...was 
following me since I enter the United States of America, and they 
were engaging in a cover operation against me and potentially the 19 
hijacker...I have proof that they were carrying an undercover 
operation against me, because my address and many other elements 
inside my case prove that they were following...I can prove that 
since the day I am in the United States of America and before..I have 
been under surveillance." --Zacarias Moussaoui, UNITED STATES OF 
AMERICA vs. ZACARIAS MOUSSAOUI, June 13, 2002

"I have requested to appear in front of  the grand jury, because I 
want to, to say everything I know, but the government refuse, because 
they know the implication if I were to say.  And I request to take 
the stand and to say to the people of America what I know about...al 
Qaeda...and about conspiracy.  But the United States government know 
that they don't want, because they have charged me with this crime, 
and they don't want the matter to be investigated, because as I've 
tried to put forward to the people of America and the world, that, in 
fact, the government knew about the activity of the people who were 
preparing September 11, and they have decided to arrest me  because 
they knew that I was not directly involved with these people." -- 
Zacarias Moussaoui, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. ZACARIAS MOUSSAOUI, 
July 25, 2002     

Anyway, I believe you've touched on a lot of excellent points, all of 
them backed with references.  I'd keep plugging away and use as much 
individual testimony as possible.  The more testimony you have -- 
especially within their own agencies -- the less power the US 
government has to simply write off the "conspiracy theorists."

Keep up the good work and best of luck to you in your 
presentation.          


Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs
-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org 
OM 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
--- End Message ---
  • [CTRL] Fwd: [CIA-DRUGS] Re: September 11, Islamic Jihad or another Northwoods? RoadsEnd