-Caveat Lector-

            http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/nation09.htm

 -------------------------------------------------------------------

                    The Early History of Man

                             Part 4

    Living Dinosaurs from Anglo-Saxon and other Early Records.

 -------------------------------------------------------------------

                           INTRODUCTION

 The creation model of origins makes many predictions, one of them
 being that evidence will be found which tells us, in the recent
 past dinosaurs and man have co-existed.  There is, in fact, good
 evidence to suggest they still co-exist, and this is directly
 contrary to the evolutionary model which teaches dinosaurs lived
 millions of before man came along, and no man therefore can ever
 have seen a living dinosaur.  For present purposes we will ignore
 evidence from the fossil record on this subject as this has been
 dealt with elsewhere.  We will, instead examine the issue by
 considering the written evidence that has survived from the records
 of various ancient peoples that describes, sometimes in the most
 graphic detail, human encounters with living giant reptiles we
 would call dinosaurs.

 There are, of course, the famous descriptions of such monsters from
 the Old Testament, Behemoth and Leviathan (Job 40:15-41:34,)
 Behemoth being a giant vegetarian that lived on the fens, and
 Leviathan a somewhat more terrrifying armour-plated amphibian whom
 only children and the most foolhardy would want as a pet.  The
 Egyptians knew Behemoth by the name p'ih.mw, 1 which is the same
 name, of course.  Leviathan was similarly known as Lotan to the men
 of Ugarit. 23  Babylonian and Sumerian literature has preserved
 details of similar creatures, as has the written and unwritten
 folklore of peoples around the world.  But perhaps the most
 remarkable descriptions of living dinosaurs are those the
 Anglo-Saxon and Celtic peoples of Europe have passed down to us.


                          A BRIEF SURVEY

 The early Britons, from whom the modern Welsh are descended,
 provide us with our earliest surviving European accounts of
 reptilian monsters, one of whom killed and devoured king Morvidus
 (Morydd) in about 336 BC.  We are told in the original early Welsh
 account (which Geoffrey of Monmouth translated into Latin and which
 still survives in spite of modernist claims to the contrary 4) that
 the monster "gulped down the body of Morvidus as a big fish
 swallows a little one."  Geoffrey wrote of the monster under its
 Latin name, Belua. 5

 Peredur, not the ancient king of that name (306 - 296 BC), but a
 much later son of Earl Efrawg, had better luck than Morvidus,
 actually managing to slay his monster, an addanc (pronounced
 athanc: variant afanc,) at a place called Llyn Llion in Wales. 6
 At other Welsh locations the addanc is further spoken of along with
 another reptilian species known as the carrog.  The addanc survived
 until comparatively recent times at such places as Bedd-yr-Afanc
 near Brynberian, at Llyn-yr-Afanc above Bettws-y-Coed on the River
 Conwy (the killing of this monster was described in the year 1693),
 and Llyn Barfog (see Appendix).  A carrog is commemorated at Carrog
 near Corwen, and at Dol-y-Carrog in the Vale of Conwy. 7

 In England and Scotland, again until comparatively recent times,
 other reptilian monsters were sighted and spoken of in many places.
 Table 1 lists 81 locations in the British Isles alone in which
 dinosaur activity has been reported (there are, in fact, nearly 200
 such places in Britain.)  But perhaps the most relevant aspect of
 this, as far as our present study, is concerned, is the fact some
 of these sightings and subsequent encounters with living dinosaurs
 can be dated to the very recent past.  The giant reptile at Bures
 in Suffolk, for example, is known to us from a chronicle of 1405:-

      "Close to the town of Bures, near Sudbury, there has lately
      appeared, to the great hurt of the countryside, a dragon, vast
      in body, with a crested head, teeth like a saw, and (a tail
      extending to an enormous length.  Having slaughtered the
      shepherd of a flock, it devoured many sheep..."

 After an unsuccessful attempt by local archers to kill the beast,
 due to its impenetrable hide...

      "in order to destroy him, all the country people around were
      summoned.  But when the dragon saw that he was again to be
      assailed with arrows, he fled into a marsh or mere and there
      hid himself among the long reeds, and was never more seen." 8,9

 -----------------------------------------------------------------

  Aller, Somerset                   Llyn-y-Gader, Wales
  Anwick, Lincolnshire              Llyn-yr-Afanc, Wales
  Bamburgh, Northumberland          Loch Awe, Scotland
  Beckhole, North Yorkshire         Loch Maree, Scotland
  Bedd-yr-Afanc, Wales              Loch Morar, Scotland
  Ben Vair, Scotland                Loch Ness, Scotland
  Bignor Hill, West Sussex          Loch Rannoch, Scotland
  Bishop Auckland, Durham           Longwitton, Northumberland
  Bisterne, Hampshire               Ludham, Norfolk
  Bren Pelham, Hertfordshire        Lyminster, West Sussex
  Brinsop, Hereford and Worcester   Manaton, Devon
  Bures, Suffolk                    Money Hill, Northumberland
  Cadbury Castle, Devon             Moston, Cheshire
  Carhampton, Somerset              Newcastle Emlyn, Wales
  Castle Carlton, Lincolnshire      Norton Fitzwarren, Hereford and
  Castle Neroche, Somerset               Worcester
  Challacombe, Devon                Nunnington, North Yorkshire
  Churchstanton, Somerset           Old Field Barrows (nr Bromfield)
  Cnoc-na-Cnoimh, Scotland               Shropshire
  Crowcombe, Somerset               Penllin Castle, Wales
  Dalry, Scotland                   Penmark, Wales
  Deerhurst, Gloucestershire        Penmynydd, Wales
  Dol-y-Carrog, Wales               St Albans, Hertfordshire
  Dragonhoard (nr Garsington),      St Leonard's Forest, West Sussex
       Oxfordshire                  St Osyth, Essex
  Drake Howe, North Yorkshire       Saffron Waldon, Essex
  Drakelow, Derbyshire              Sexhow, North Yorkshire
  Drakelowe, Worcestershire         Shervage Wood, Hereford and
  Filey Brigg, North Yorkshire           Worcester
  Handale Priory, North Yorkshire   Slingsby, North Yorkshire
  Henham, Essex                     Sockburn, Durham
  Hornden, Essex                    Stinchcombe, Gloucestershire
  Kellington, North Yorkshire       Strathmartin, Scotland
  Kilve, Somerset                   Walmsgate, Lincolnshire
  Kingston St Mary, Somerset        Wantley, South Yorkshire
  Lambton Castle, Durham            Well, North Yorkshire
  Linton, Scotland                  Wherwell, Hampshire
  Little Cornard, Suffolk           Whitehorse Hill, Oxfordshire
  Llandeilo Graban, Wales           Winkleigh, Devon
  Llanraeadr-ym-Mochnant, Wales     Wiston, Wales
  Llyn Bartog, Wales                Wormelow Tump, Hereford and
  Llyn Cynwch (nr Dolgellau),            Worcester
        Wales                       Wormingford, Essex
  Llyn Llion, Wales

 -----------------------------------------------------------------
 Table 1, Above, in alphabetical order, appear the names of 81
 locations in Britain where dinosaur activity has been reported or
 is remembered.  This list could be expanded to nearly 200
 place-names.


 Later in the fifteenth century, according to a contemporary
 chronicle that still survives in Canterbury Cathedral's library,
 the following incident was reported.  On the afternoon of Friday,
 26th September, 1449, two reptiles were seen fighting on the banks
 of the River Stour (near the village of Little Cornard) which
 marked the English county borders of Suffolk and Essex.  One was
 black, and the other, reddish and spotted.  After an hour long
 struggle that took place "to the admiration of many [of the locals]
 beholding them," the black monster yielded and returned to its
 lair, the scene of the conflict being known ever since as
 Sharpfight Meadow. 10, 11

 As late as August, 1614, the following sober account was given of a
 strange reptile that was encountered in St Leonard's Forest in
 Sussex (the sighting was near a village that was known as Dragon's
 Green long before this report was published):

      "This serpent (or dragon as some call it) is reputed to be
      nine feete, or rather more, in length, and shaped almost in
      the form of an axletree of a cart; a quantitie of thickness in
      the middest, and somewhat smaller at both endes.  The former
      part, which he shootes forth as a necke, is supposed to be an
      elle [3ft 9 inches or 114 cms] long; with a white ring, as it
      were, of scales about it.  The scales along his back seem to
      be blackish, and so much as is discovered under his bellie,
      appeareth to be red... it is likewise discovered to have large
      feete, but the eye may there be deceived, for some suppose
      that serpents have no feete... [The dragon] rids aways (as we
      call it) as fast as a man can run.  His food [rabbits] is
      thought to be for the most part, in a coniewarren, which he
      much frequents... There are likewise upon either side of him
      discovered two great buches so big as a large foote-ball, and
      (as some thinke) will in time grow to wings, but God, I hope,
      will (to defend the poor people in the neighbourhood) that he
      shall be destroyed before he grows to fledge." 12, 13

 This dragon was seen in various places within a circuit of three or
 four miles, and the pamphlet named some of the still-living
 witnesses who had seen him.  These included John Steele,
 Christopher Holder and a certain 'widow woman dwelling neare
 Faygate.'  Another witness was 'the carrier of Horsham, who lieth
 at the White Horse [inn] in Southwark. ' One of the locals set his
 two mastiffs on to the monster, and apart from losing his dogs he
 was fortunate to escape alive from the encounter' for the dragon
 was already credited with the deaths of a man and woman at whom it
 had spat and who consequently had been killed by its venom.  When
 approached unwillingly, our pamphleteer tells us' the monster
 was...

      "....of countenance very proud and at the sight or hearing of
      men or cattle will raise his neck upright and seem to listen
      and looke about, with great arrogancy." ...an eyewitness
      account of typically reptilian behaviour.

 Again, as late as 27th and 28th May 1669, which fell on a Thursday
 and Friday, a large reptilian animal was sighted many times, as was
 reported in the pamphlet:  A True Relation of a Monstrous Serpent
 seen at Henham (Essex) on the Mount in Saffron Waldon. 14

 In 1867 was seen, for the last time, the monster that lived in the
 woods around Fittleworth in Sussex.  It would run up to people
 hissing and spitting if they happened to stumble across it
 unawares, although it never harmed anyone.  Several such cases
 could be cited, but suffice it to say that too many incidents like
 these are reported down through the centuries and from all sorts of
 locations for us to say that they are all fairytales.  For example,
 Scotland's famous Lock Ness monster is too often thought to be a
 recent product of the local Tourist Board's efforts to bring in
 some trade, yet Loch Ness is by no means the only Scottish lock
 where monsters have been reported.  Loch Lomond, Loch Awe, Loch
 Rannoch and the privately owned Loch Morar (over l000ft or 305m
 deep) also have records of dinosaur activity in recent years.
 Indeed, there have been over forty sightings at Loch Morar alone
 since the end of the World War II, and over a thousand from Loch
 Ness in the same period.

 However, as far as Loch Ness itself is concerned, few realize that
 monstrous reptiles, no doubt the same species, have been sighted in
 and around the loch since the so-called Dark Ages, the most notable
 instance being that which is described in Adamnan's famous 7th
 century Life of St Columba.  There we read that in the year AD 656
 Columba, on yet another of his missionary journeys in the north,
 needed to cross the River Ness.  As he was about to do so, he saw a
 burial party.  On enquiry he was informed that they were burying a
 man who had just been killed by a savage bite from a monster who
 had snatched him while swimming.  On hearing this, the brave
 Columba, his curiosity aroused and with never a thought for his own
 safety, immediately ordered one of his followers to jump into the
 freezing water.  Adamnan relates how the thrashing about of the
 alarmed and unhappy swimmer (Lugne Mocumin by name) attracted the
 monster's attention.  Suddenly, on breaking the surface, the
 monster was seen to speed towards the luckless chap with its mouth
 wide open and screaming like a banshee.  Columba, however, refused
 to panic, and from the safety of the dry land rebuked the beast.
 Whether the swimmer added any rebukes of his own is not recorded,
 but the monster was seen to turn away, having approached the
 swimmer so closely that not the length of a puntpole lay between
 them.  Columba, naturally, claimed the credit for the swimmer's
 survival, although the reluctance of the monster to actually harm
 the man is the most notable thing in this incident.  The first
 swimmer had been savaged and killed, though not eaten, and the
 second swimmer was likewise treated to a display of the monster's
 wrath, though not fatally.  Most likely, the two men had
 unwittingly entered the water close to where the monster kept her
 young, and she was reacting in a way that is typical of most
 species.  Gorillas, bull elephants, ostriches, indeed all sorts of
 creature will charge at a man, hissing, screaming and trumpeting
 alarmingly, yet will rarely kill him so long as the man takes the
 hint and goes away.  Our second swimmer, utterly lacking his
 saintly master's fortitude, doubtless began the process of taking
 the hint in plenty of time for the monster to realize that killing
 him would be unnecessary.

 Yet not even Lugne Mocumin's experience is that uncommon.  As
 recently as the l8th century, in a lake called Lyn-y-Gader in
 Snowdon, Wales, a certain man went swimming.  He reached the middle
 of the lake and was returning to the shore when his friends who
 were watching him noticed that he was being followed by...

      "a long, trailing object winding slowly behind him.  They were
      afraid to raise an alarm, but went forward to meet him as soon
      as he reached the shore where they stood.  Just as he was
      approaching, the trailing object raised its head, and before
      anyone could render aid the man was enveloped in the coils of
      the monster..." 15

 It seems that the man's body was never recovered.

 At about the turn of this present century, the following incident
 took place.  It was related by a Lady Gregory of Ireland in 1920:

      "old people told me that they were swimming there (in an Irish
      lake called Lough Graney,) and a man, had gone out into the
      middle, and they saw something like a great big eel making for
      him..." 16, 17

 Happily, on this occasion the man made it back to the shore, but
 the important thing for us to notice is that these are only a few
 of a great many reports concerning the sightings in recent times of
 lake-dwelling monsters or dinosaurs.  Indeed, it is almost needless
 to point out that perfectly rational people still report such
 sightings today.  However, the British Isles are not the only place
 where one can find such reports.  They occur, quite literally, all
 over the world, 18 and space forbids further discussion of such a
 general and largely undisputed observation.  We will therefore
 concentrate our attention entirely on the recorded and most
 informative evidence that has been left us by the early Saxons and
 Celts.


                        ARTISTIC DEPICTlONS

 Of particular interest to our enquiry is the depiction in Celtic
 and Saxon art of strange monsters and animals, most of whom over
 the centuries show an inexplicable consistency in their parts and
 proportions for works of supposedly fictional art.  The 8th century
 Irish Book of Kells, for example, contains numerous depictions of
 everyday animals.  There are fish, cats, dogs and birds whose
 portrayal, though somewhat stylized, is nevertheless anatomically
 correct.  They are readily recognizable.  But alongside these are
 other creatures whose features are not so easily recognized due to
 the simple fact that they no longer live.  These are strange
 reptilian beasts whose appearances were familiar enough to the
 Celtic artist who painted them in such meticulous detail, though
 not to us.  In Figure 1 we see, from the pages of another ancient
 manuscript, a strange and presumably dead aquatic beast actually
 being examined by a man.  The artist himself, perhaps?

 In Figure 2 (a and b) we have an even more remarkable scene.  The
 stone in which these strange animals were carved is preserved in
 the church of SS Mary and Hardulph at Breedon-on-the-hill in
 Leicestershire.  This church used to belong to the Saxon kingdom of
 Mercia.  The stone itself is part of a larger frieze in which are
 depicted various birds and humans all of them readily recognizable.
 But what are these strange animals presented here?  They are like
 nothing that survives today in England, yet they are depicted as
 vividly as the other creatures.  There are long-necked quadrupeds,
 one of whom on the right seems to be biting (or 'necking' with)
 another.  And in the middle of the scene appears a bipedal animal
 who is attacking one of the quadrupeds.  He stands on two great
 hind legs and has two smaller fore-limbs.  His victim seems to be
 turning to defend himself, yet his hind legs are buckled in fear.
 Is there an animal from the fossil record that we know was a
 predator who had two massive hindlegs and two smaller forelimbs?
 We shall shortly be meeting another just like him in a certain
 written account, but how was this early Saxon artist to know about
 such creatures if he'd never seen one?  Furthermore, do we know
 other animals from the fossil record who were gregarious, large and
 long-necked quadrupeds?  (Note how the quadrupeds seem to have been
 feeding off the vegetation depicted in the background.)  It cannot
 be pretended that these are mere caricatures of ordinary animals
 that are indigenous to the British Isles, for none of our present
 native species have long necks or are bipedal.  So how are we to
 satisfactorily account for them if not as readily recognizable
 types of dinosaurs that had survived until Saxon times?

 Figure 3 provides us with further visual evidence.  It again is
 early Saxon in origin, being a piece of ornamentation from what was
 once a circular shield.  Here we are presented with the likeness of
 a flying reptile which was known to the Saxons as a widfloga (see
 below.)  Note the long, teeth-filled jaws and the wings folded
 along its sides.  The shape of the head is equally interesting.  Do
 we know a flying reptile from the fossil record with this shape and
 features? Again we shall meet his like in a written account shortly.

 Figures 4 and 5 likewise portray large reptilian animals that are
 no longer living.  They are surprisingly alike.  They are each the
 figurehead from Danish ships of the Viking era, and they both
 portray the same type of sea-monster that is also written about,
 and named, in the account that appears below.

 The famous White Horse of Uffington in Oxfordshire is now thought
 by many to represent, not a horse at all, but an early Celtic
 dragon (Dragon's Hill stands nearby), and later by several
 centuries, are the carvings or sculptures in Figures 6 and 7.
 Such creatures are seen in old churches up and down the country,
 and most are depictions of animals that are strongly reminiscent of
 those species of dinosaur that are now (happily) known to us only
 from the fossil record.


                       THE WRITTEN ACCOUNTS

 But now we come to the most notable records of all.  They are
 written works that are remarkable for the graphic detail with which
 they portray the giant reptiles the early Saxons, Danes and others
 encountered in Northern Europe and Scandinavia.  In various Nordic
 sagas the slaying of dragons is depicted in some detail, and this
 helps us to reconstruct the physical appearance of some of these
 creatures.  In the Volsungassaga, for example, the slaying of the
 monster Fafnir was accomplished by Sigurd digging a pit and
 waiting, inside the pit, for the monster to crawl overhead on its
 way to the water. 19  This allowed Sigurd to attack the dinosaur's
 soft underbelly.  Clearly, Fafnir walked on all fours with his
 belly close to the ground.

 Likewise, the Voluspa tells us of a certain monster which the early
 Vikings called a Nithhoggr, its name ('corpse-tearer') revealing
 the fact that it lived off carrion.  Saxo Grammaticus, in his Gesta
 Danorum, tells us of the Danish king Frotho's fight with a giant
 reptile, and it is in Saxo, that the monster is described in great
 detail.  It was, he says, a serpent...

      "wreathed in coils, doubled in many a fold, and with a tail
      drawn out in winding whorls, shaking his manifold spirals and
      shedding venom... his slaver [saliva] burns up what it
      bespatters.." ['yet,' he tells the king in words that were
      doubtless meant to encourage rather than dismay], "remember to
      keep the dauntless temper of thy mind; nor let the point of
      the jagged tooth trouble thee, nor the starkness of the beast,
      nor the venom... there is a place under his lowest belly
      whither thou mayst plunge the blade." 20

 The description of this reptilian monster closely resembles that of
 the monster seen at Henham (see above), and the two animals could
 well have belonged to the same or a similar species.  Notable,
 especially, is their defense mechanism of spitting corrosive venom
 at their victims, a mechanism that is replicated exactly in today's
 Bombadier Beetle.  Frotho's monster, however, would seem to be the
 larger of the two.

 But it is the epic poem Beowulf that provides us with truly
 invaluable descriptions of the huge reptilian animals that, only
 1400 years ago, infested Denmark. 21


                       BEOWULF: THE HISTORY

 The Beowulf poem itself survives in a single manuscript copy that
 was made in about AD 1000 (see Figure 8.)  Moreover this manuscript
 (British Museum. Cotton. Vitellius A.XV.) is often stated by modern
 critics to be a copy, of a mid-8th century Anglo-Saxon (English)
 original.  This original is in turn described as an essentially,
 Christian poem.  Yet, the continually repeated assertion of the
 supposedly Christian origins of the poem fails noticeably to take
 into account the following facts.

 Firstly, there are no allusions whatever in the poem to any event,
 person or teaching of the New Testament.  There are definite
 allusions to certain facts and personages contained in the Old
 Testament, namely to God, the Creation, to Abel and to Cain, but
 these are no more than those same historical allusions that are to
 be met with in the other pre-Christian Anglo-Saxon genealogies and
 records that we have already studied.  Like those records, and
 whilst likewise showing a most interesting historical knowledge of
 certain events and personages that also appear in the Genesis
 record, the poem clearly pre-dates any knowledge among the
 Anglo-Saxons of Christianity per se.

 In view of this, it is hardly surprising to find that the
 sentiments of the poem are strongly pagan, extolling the highly
 questionable virtues of vengeance, the accumulation of plunder, and
 the boasting of and reliance upon human strength and prowess.
 Allusions are also made to blatantly pagan oaths, sacrifices,
 sentiments and forms of burial.  There are no exclusively Christian
 sentiments expressed anywhere in its 3182 lines.

 Nowhere in the poem is any reference made to the British Isles or
 to any British (or English) king or historical event.  This is
 simply because the Beowulf pre-dates the migration of the Saxons to
 those isles.  And what are we to make of the following passage?:

      "...fortham Offa waes geofum ond guthum garcene man wide
      geweorthod wisdome heold ethel sinne thonon Eomer woc
      haelethum to helpe..." (lines 1957-1961, emphasis mine).

 Alexander translates this:

      '...So it was that Offa [king of the continental Angles],
      brave with the spear, was spoken of abroad for his wars and
      his gifts; he governed with wisdom the land of his birth.
      To him was born Eomer, helper of the heroes...' 22

 The Offa who is mentioned here was the pre-migration ancestor of
 his 8th century namesake, King Offa of Mercia (AD 757 - 796), whom
 we have already met (along with this same ancestor), in the early
 Saxon genealogies.  We have also met Eomer in the same genealogies,
 23 where his name is rendered Eomaer and where he is, strictly
 speaking, the grandson, and not the son, of Offa.  These ancient
 genealogies were clearly fresh in the mind of the writer of
 Beowulf, which again tell us something of the times in which the
 poem was composed. 24

 There is, moreover, no sycophantic dedication of the poem to any
 Christian Anglo-Saxon English king, not even to that King Offa
 whose ancestor is immortalised in the poem and under whose auspices
 some modem scholars suggest the poem was written.

 Many other scholars would plumb for an even later date for the
 poem, yet the characters in the poem can be historically dated to
 the late 5th and early 6th centuries, years that long preceded the
 adoption of Christianity by the Saxons.  In other words, the poem
 belongs firmly to the pagan times of which it treats.

 Beowulf, the character in whose honour the poem was written, was
 born the son of Ecgtheow in AD 495 (see Table 2).  At the age of
 seven, in AD 502, he was brought to the court of Hrethel, his
 maternal grandfather (AD 445 - 503) who was then king of the
 Geatingas, a tribe who inhabited what is today southern Sweden (and
 whose eponymous founder, Geat, also appears in the early
 genealogies).  After an unpromising and feckless youth, during
 which years were fought the Geatish/Swedish wars, in particular the
 Battle of Ravenswood [Hrefnawudu] in the year AD 510, Beowulf
 undertook his celebrated journey to Denmark, to visit Hrothgar,
 King of the Danes. This was in AD 515, Beowulf's twentieth year.
 (This was also the year of his slaying the monster Grendel which we
 shall examine shortly.  Six years later, in AD 521, Beowulf's uncle,
 King Hygelac, was slain.

 Hygelac himself is known to have lived from AD 475 - 521, having
 come to the throne of the Geatingas in AD 503, the year of his
 father Hrethel's death.  He is independently mentioned in Gregory
 of Tour's Histotiae (sic!) Francorum, where his name is rendered
 Chlochilaichus. 25, 36  There, and in other Latin Frankish sources,
 27 he is described as a Danish king (Chogilaicus Danorum rex), not
 a Geat, but this is the same mistake that our own English
 chroniclers made when they included even the Norwegian Vikings
 under the generic name of Danes.  The Liber Monstrorum, however,
 did correctly allude to him as rex Getarum, king of the Geats.
 Saxo also mentions him as the Hugletus who destroyed the Swedish
 chief Homothus.  Homothus, in turn, is the same as that Eanmund who
 is depicted in line 2612 of the Beowulf poem. 28 (See also Table 3.)

 On Hygelac's death, Beowulf declined the offer to succeed his uncle
 to the throne of the Geatingas, choosing instead to act as guardian
 to Hygelac's son, prince Heardred, during the years of Heardred's
 minority.  (Heardred lived from AD 511 - 533.  He was therefore in
 his tenth year when he became king.)  Heardred, however, was killed
 by the Swedes in AD 533 (he had given shelter to the Swedish king
 Onela's nephews - see Table 3), and it was in this year that
 Beowulf took over the reins of kingship.  Beowulf went on to rule
 his people in peace for fifty years, dying at some 88 years of age
 in the year AD 583.  The manner of his death, though, is
 particularly relevant to our study as we shall see.



 -------------------------------------------------------------------

 Bill Cooper is a keen student of Bible history, archaeology and
 paleontology.  He first introduced he subject of living dinosaurs
 in early records in Anglo-Saxon Dinosaurs As Described in Early
 Historical Records, Creation Science Movement (England), Pamphlet
 Series #280.

 Bill Cooper, 87 Convent Rd., Ashford, MIDDX TW15 2HW, England


 -------------------------------------------------------------------



.

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to