-Caveat Lector-
>From www.wsws.org
WSWS : News & Analysis : North America : US Elections
Europe's right wing media gloats, while liberals' fear discrediting of US democracy
following Supreme Court verdict
By Chris Marsden
16 December 2000
Back to screen version
There is a growing recognition within Europe's media that what they often glibly,
and indeed smugly, dismissed as America's �election farce� has serious political
import. The Republican political coup has been hailed by the rightwing as a triumph.
More liberal commentators, in contrast, have sounded ominous warnings of the
political implications of such a naked attack on democratic rights.
Britain's Sun newspaper, published by Rupert Murdoch, was the most unabashed in
hailing the US Supreme Court verdict enabling George W Bush to steal the
presidential election. Having a Republican administration in the US signalled that,
�The world's political swingometer has swung to the right.� For this reason, �It
doesn't matter that Bush only just won� [one might add... or indeed how]. �In the
words of that great friend of America, Margaret Thatcher: �REJOICE! REJOICE!'� ...
�The good guys, ladies and gentlemen, are back in charge.�
The house organ of Britain's Conservative Party, the Telegraph, was equally
triumphal. Bush is compared with Clinton in order to illustrate the dawn of a new
era of right wing reaction: �Unlike Bill Clinton, he speaks for the often overlooked
half of the �Baby Boomer' generation that does not shirk traditional values. As a
graduate of the Yale class of 1968, at the height of the Vietnam War, he observed
large tracts of the future American elite turning from pro-Americanism to self-
hatred�and did not like what he saw.�
This will have its impact domestically in a turn to repressive law and order
measures guided by the Supreme Court's �most brilliant member, Antonin Scalia�. Most
importantly for the Telegraph, US Foreign policy will be hardline and militaristic.
�Mr Clinton's �culture of therapy'�of talking things over with the delinquents of
the world�has emboldened tyrants from Baghdad to Pyongyang,� the editorial asserts.
�After eight years of uncertain trumpets, all true Atlanticists can look forward to
some real leadership in the White House, rather than the nervous multilateralism of
a man who was profoundly ambiguous about the use of American power.�
This, the Telegraph believes, will put the European powers firmly in their place and
show the pro-European Labour Party the error of its ways: �For this country, the
costs of jumping the wrong way could be very heavy indeed, even to the extent that
the 'special relationship' in intelligence might be jeopardised.
�There are certainly particular pockets of discontent who will find it hard to
accept this result,� the newspaper complains, �notably in black America.� But this
is due simply to a �cult of victimhood� that �could well poison political discourse
well beyond the confines of the inner city ghettos.�
The Telegraph advises against compromise in favour of whipping up a racist backlash
in the prosperous suburbs, arguing, �there is little that Mr Bush can do about it
without debasing himself�and he may even derive some strength in Middle America from
such recriminations.�
In face of such gloating by the political right, several newspapers have insisted
that the whole affair is a storm in a teacup. Germany's Die Zeit, co-edited by ex
Federal Chancellor Helmut Schmidt, blithely proclaims that, �America's
constitutional system is holding up... The people see it in the same way�. The
conservative Die Welt predicts �a readiness to compromise by the two parties, and of
�healing the wounds� because Bush has �no other choice�.
Other journals are far less sanguine. Several newspapers internationally have warned
that the successful campaign by the Republicans to subvert the election has done far-
reaching damage to the political stability of the US and the authority of its
constitutional arrangements.
France's Le Monde states that the Supreme Court ruling halting Florida's recount
"asserted the primacy of procedure, the electoral timetable, over principle: one
vote, one voice". Earlier, the December edition of Le Monde Diplomatique commented,
�The new president will enter the White House with an authority as disputed as the
result of the vote of 7 November... The likely compromise between the two parties
(which have no fundamental differences between them) will not stop the institutional
model of the US being gravely tarnished by the electoral and legal chaos in
Florida.�
Britain's pro-Labour Daily Mirror says the Supreme Court, �did not uphold the law.
They chose to ignore justice and back their party's candidate. What an example to
set. Don't let America now come preaching to the rest of the world about rights and
wrongs, about justice and injustice. Their legal and political systems have behaved
no more honourably than those of a banana republic.� After �A shameful day for US
democracy�, Bush's presidency, �is so tainted before it begins that America faces
becoming the world's laughing stock over the next four years.�
The liberal Guardian says of the Supreme Court, �By its action, the antithesis of
jurisprudence, the court is in contempt of the electorate. It may not, in this
generation's lifetime, recover its reputation. And American political discourse may
never be the same again.�
Expanding on this theme, the editorial warns that the Republican election fix
�leaves in its wake shockingly unfamiliar but very real doubts about the fundamental
fairness and honesty of American democracy. In that broad sense, this election was
truly a shattering event.�
The Guardian's political editor Hugo Young warns in similar fashion, that, �The easy
thing to say is that all is well. Baritone America sends out oak-smoked voices of
reassurance. Embassies tell us the system has emerged triumphant. The result will
hold, the people will support it, the country will unite, democracy is secured. The
US, we're told, is bigger that any of the puzzles that could not be resolved in the
last five weeks. Now the definitive answer is declared. There's no meltdown in the
markets, no army in the streets. Election 2000 was just a blip on history's screen.
�I'm afraid this is not true. The election has been a calamity without precedent.
Its result is unacceptable, will not be accepted by large numbers of Americans...
Democracy, quite simply, was poisoned to put George W Bush in the White House.�
The liberal German daily S�ddeutsche Zeitung states that the US is still "deeply
split" and "the tense political climate could explode." It continues, "for ten
years, the gulf between the camps has been growing... the moderate centre of the
country is being taken hostage by the whip hands of the ideological extremes in the
USA. Beside the ideologists on the right, the judiciary has taken possession of
politics."
"The unholy trend found its provisional high point in the impeachment proceedings
against President Clinton, when parliament and the highest court united in the
impeachment process. Now for the second time, the highest court is drawn into the
�thicket of politics', against which that legendary judge Felix Frankfurter warned
fifty years ago."
�The judges ignored the fact completely that there is a second principle in a
democracy: Each vote counts... A not inconsiderable group in the American public
will now understand that even the highest court is part of a brutal party machine,
which for a long time determines the rules in parliament and government...�
Maurizio Blondet, writing in the Italian Catholic daily Avvenire, quotes dissenting
Supreme Court Justice John Stevens' statement that �the faith of the nation in the
judiciary as the impartial guardians of the law� has been undermined. Blondet calls
these, �Words of stone, terrible in the mouth of a supreme magistrate. Resembling in
expression what the USA has heard only in tragic moments of their history�the civil
war. And this is alarming. A sign that the constitutional wound is deeper than many
think and cuts literally the American heart. It cracks the fundamental faith of the
public in �their' institutions.�
Copyright 1998-2000
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved
A<>E<>R
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Integrity has no need of rules. -Albert Camus (1913-1960)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The libertarian therefore considers one of his prime educational
tasks is to spread the demystification and desanctification of the
State among its hapless subjects. His task is to demonstrate
repeatedly and in depth that not only the emperor but even the
"democratic" State has no clothes; that all governments subsist
by exploitive rule over the public; and that such rule is the reverse
of objective necessity. He strives to show that the existence of
taxation and the State necessarily sets up a class division between
the exploiting rulers and the exploited ruled. He seeks to show that
the task of the court intellectuals who have always supported the State
has ever been to weave mystification in order to induce the public to
accept State rule and that these intellectuals obtain, in return, a
share in the power and pelf extracted by the rulers from their deluded
subjects.
[[For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto, Murray N. Rothbard,
Fox & Wilkes, 1973, 1978, p. 25]]
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
