Benseraglio2
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:18:19 -0700
|
In a message dated 8/31/2004 8:53:31 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Sprinkler Cities" may be the latest "fad," but we saw exactly this The obvious problem with sprinkler cities is that at some point out West they're gonna run out of water to sprinkle all those stupid suburbs. You can only find water to create places like Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Phoenix in the middle of the desert for so long. As everybody should know, water politics is big time stuff already out in the arid West. (Remember Jack Nicholson in "Chinatown"?)
Leaving the junk behind and fleeing to a new frontier is the American way. But at some point, as Miggle sagely points out, we run out of hydrocarbon fuel. And of course it's not just we Americans who are addicted to oil. One of the things that really disappointed me about places like Korea, Vietnam and China is how they had a perfect chance to create future-looking transportation systems and instead opted for the archaic clunky old automobile.
One of the things I love about old rust-belt Philly is the way it's emptying out, people are scurrying off southwest to the newest sprinkler. That's just perfect for an Amish like me. It means we slowly get an extra-livable walking-size city with lots of green space and all the cultural amenities, while the Yahoos are tying themselves up in traffic out in the sprawling nowhereland suburbs.
Ross Bender
|