edufactory-request
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:00:59 -0800
Send edufactory mailing list submissions to
edufact...@listcultures.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/edufactory_listcultures.org
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
edufactory-requ...@listcultures.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
edufactory-ow...@listcultures.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of edufactory digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. How Much Does College Cost, and Why? - Doug Henwood (enda brophy)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 09:54:26 -0500
From: enda brophy <enda.bro...@gmail.com>
Subject: <edu-factory> How Much Does College Cost, and Why? - Doug
Henwood
To: Conflicts and Transformations of the University
<edufact...@listcultures.org>
Message-ID:
<afc1987b1003090654w6d177423ga037d583b5425...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
http://www.leftbusinessobserver.com/College.html
The following article appeared in Left Business Observer #125, February
2010. Copyright 2010, Left Business Observer.
------------------------------
*I?m borrowing my way through college?*
As everyone knows, the way to get ahead these days is by accumulating
degrees. A rising education premium, as they say in economics, is the
favorite official explanation for the increase in inequality over the last
three decades. That?s far from a complete explanation, of course?it
overlooks the decline of unions, for example?but there?s no doubt that the
further you get in school, the more money you make. The problem is that it?s
getting harder to pay the freight.
Graphed nearby is that legendary education
premium<http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/education/cps2008/tabA-3.xls>.
Note first how badly high-school dropouts have done. Back in the mid-1970s,
they earned about 20% less than those who got a diploma; that deficiency has
expanded to over 30%. [Since these are all expressed relative to high school
grads, there is no line for them?it would be flat at 100%.] The advantage
for those with more than high school has grown substantially?though that
trend mostly topped out by the late 1990s. As of 2007, the average college
graduate earned 83% more than a high school grad; those with advanced
degrees, 159% more. By the way, the increase in the education premium has
been particularly strong for women; although the male bachelor?s premium is
larger than the female, the patriarch?s advantage has narrowed considerably
over the last three decades.
Inflation
But how the price of grabbing the credential has risen! Inflation in college
tuition almost makes the medical kind look reasonable. Since 1980, the
overall consumer price index <http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/dsrv?cu> is up
179%; that for medical care, 436%; and that for college tuition and fees,
827%. And while medical inflation actually slowed a bit between the 1990s
and 2000s, college inflation actually accelerated.
Such rates of inflation leave family incomes in the dust. According
to the College
Board <http://www.trends-collegeboard.com/college_pricing/>, posted annual
costs?and in this and all subsequent cases that means tuition, fees, room,
and board?for attending the typical private four-year institution were 26%
of average (median) family incomes in 1979; they?re now 58%. For public
four-year institutions, the bite went from 12% to 25% of average incomes
over the same period. In other words, the burden relative to incomes roughly
doubled for both, and the cost of attending a public university now is
almost as heavy as the cost of attending a private one three decades ago.
Of course, as the old saying goes, only suckers pay retail. There is aid
available, especially for poorer families, and not all of it loans, which
greatly reduces the costs of attending college. The College Board makes a
big deal out of this in its annual reports on the costs of higher education.
But many barriers remain.
Take, for example, the Board?s
estimates<http://www.trends-collegeboard.com/student_aid/>of net costs
of attendance?tuition, room, board, and fees less
grants?relative to incomes. (See nearby graph.) In 1991?92 school year, the
net cost of attending a four-year public institution for a student from the
poorest quarter of the income distribution was around 48% of that group?s
average income; by 2007?2008 that had fallen to 44%. At least it hasn?t
risen?but 44% is still an impossible number, especially a family with an
income of $20,000, the quartile?s recent average. For the richest 25%, the
burden was steady, at around 10% of family income. For private universities,
the net cost for the poorest quartile went from 63% to 80% over the same
period; for the richest, it fell from 19% to 17%. For those in the middle
two quartiles, the burdens stayed fairly steady, falling between these
extremes. But even for a family in the second-richest quartile, average
income around $80,000, a year at a public college still cost about 19% of
income after grant aid. Of course, better-off parents have savings to dip
into, or grandparents to put the touch on. Still, students from all but the
richest families have to borrow to a public university. No wonder two-thirds
of college graduates now emerge with massive debts?an average of $23,200 in
2008, up 24% from 2004.
Access
These costs are keeping students from poorer families out of college. Thanks
to the invaluable work of Tom Mortenson, publisher of *Postsecondary
Education Opportunity <http://www.postsecondary.org/>*, we?ve got an
excellent handle on how this has played out over time. Overall, 17% of
Americans had a bachelor?s degree by age 24 in 1970. By 2008, that had risen
strongly, to 29%. But, as the graphs on the top of p. 5 show, this increase
has been driven mainly by the children of the well-off. The share of kids
from the bottom 25% of the income distribution getting a degree by 24 rose
from 6% to 9%; for the top 25%, it rose from 55% to 95%. Looked at another
way (as the graph on the right does), the offspring of the bottom quarter
accounted for 12% of bachelor?s achieved by age 24 in 1970; that fell to 9%
of the total in 2008. The share accounted for by the top quarter rose from
52% to 54% over the same period.
Clearly there are a lot of cultural barriers for poorer people getting to
college?and maybe some have no desire even to try. But there?s no doubt that
money is also a major factor.
Why?
Why has the cost of college risen so sharply? To the right, the answer is
simple. A 2005 paper <http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=3344> by
the Cato Institute puts almost the entire blame on Washington: overly
generous federal subsidies have made it easy for universities to raise
prices. Get Washington out of the college business, and the market will take
care of the rest. It makes this preposterous argument with more quotes from
Hayek than citation of actual data.
Another popular explanation, faculty salaries, doesn?t really hold water.
Average pay for full-time instructors since the early 1990s is running only
slightly ahead of inflation?and the use of part-timers has proliferated.
Universities have added some layers of management, but that can?t explain a
sustained inflation rate more than four times the overall average.
The real answers are slightly more complicated, though actually not all
that terribly so. At the very high end, elite universities are in something
of an ?arms race? to get the most desirable students. They want to pamper
and seduce, with everything from food courts to saunas to supercolliders.
And since they typically offer poor students full scholarships, they can
assuage any class guilt they suffer by presenting themselves as selection
agents for the meritocracy?which they are to some degree, if not the degree
they?d like to imagine. And given the swelling in the college premium,
parents with the means to pay the bills demanded by Harvard and Yale are
happy to write the checks, since the eventual degree will grease their kids?
way to the hedge fund trading desk.
But the real crisis of college affordability is among the public
institutions. And the reason for that is pretty straightforward: sharp
declines in public support. For example, the University of
Virginia<http://www.virginia.edu/Facts/Glance_FinanceEndowment.html>,
one of the so-called ?Public Ivies,? got 33% of its budget from the state in
1989; that was down to 12% in 2009. Tuition accounted for 19% of revenue in
1989?and 31% in 2009.
Overall, as the nearby graph shows, state and local funding has fallen hard
since 1980, and students and their parents have taken its place. That
reversed the trend of the previous twenty years. Between 1980 and 2008, the
share of higher ed expenditures coming from government fell by almost 19
percentage points?the amount by which personal expenditures had to increase.
It would not be hard at all to make higher education completely free in the
USA. It accounts for not quite 2% of GDP. The personal share, about 1% of
GDP, is a third of the income of the richest 10,000 households in the U.S.,
or three months of Pentagon spending. It?s less than four months of what we
waste on administrative costs by not having a single-payer health care
finance system. But introduce such a proposal into an election campaign and
you would be regarded as suicidally insane.
------------------------------
Home <http://www.leftbusinessobserver.com/LBO_home.html>
Mail<dhenw...@panix.com>
Articles <http://www.leftbusinessobserver.com/LBO_samples.html>
Stats/current <http://www.leftbusinessobserver.com/Stats_comments.html>
Supplements <http://www.leftbusinessobserver.com/LBO_supplements.html>
Subscriptions <http://www.leftbusinessobserver.com/LBO_subinfo.html>
Radio<http://www.leftbusinessobserver.com/Radio.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://listcultures.org/pipermail/edufactory_listcultures.org/attachments/20100309/75d45905/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
edu-factory list
www.edu-factory.org
End of edufactory Digest, Vol 23, Issue 11
******************************************
Liste de diffusion cyberinternational
Pour se désinscrire :
mailto:cyberinternational-requ...@ml.free.fr?subject=unsubscribe