Corinna Vinschen
Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:01:02 -0800
On Jan 29 15:35, Jari Aalto wrote: > > New upstream release: > > wget --recursive --no-host-directories --cut-dirs=3 \ > > http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/pngcrush/pngcrush-1.7.24.20120129+git33373b7-1-src.tar.bz2 > \ > > http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/pngcrush/pngcrush-1.7.24.20120129+git33373b7-1.tar.bz2 > \ > http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/pngcrush/setup.hint
Is that really right? The old pngcrush was 68K and linked against libpng12 and zlib, while the new one is 435K and not linked against anything. Do you really want static linking? pngcrush won't see any security update to libpng or zlib without rebuilding. I don't think that's the right thing to do. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat