Michael Ring
Mon, 20 Nov 2000 15:10:28 -0800
I only removed a stupid (imho) usage of environment-variables from patch which caused it to convert textfiles in binmounts to cr/lf files. automode.o sounds as if it were useable for patch but right now I think it should be kept as it is because it has prooven to work 'as is'. Hmm... thinking about it agauin, what about this theory: If I understand automode correctly a file on a textmount would be converted to a 'unix'-style file internally and if saved in binmode there would be no more cr/lf in the file; theory right ??? Cheers, Michael Christopher Faylor schrieb: > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 11:44:26PM +0100, Michael Ring wrote: > >Just found this thread here.... > > > >O.K. you all found me busy with other work 8-(, sorry for that. > > > >patch is in very good condition, I have been sitting on thins patch > >(well, actually been using it) for months and the changes I made to the > >code are very straightforward. I will release this asap. > > Btw, the new version of cygwin has some options that you can link with > patch that I think might make things easier. You can link with > textmode.o, binmode.o, or automode.o. textmode.o makes all opens which > do not specify otherwise default to text mode regardless of mount, > binmode.o makes all opens which do not specify otherwise default to > binmode regardless of mount, automode.o makes opening for reading > default to text and opening for writing default to binary. > > In retrospect, I wish I'd named this 'mixedmode.o' because I rediscovered > yesterday that 'auto mode' already has a meaning within the cygwin internals. > It refers to /cygdrive type of mounts. > > cgf