At 09:46 PM 3/14/01 -0500, John Young wrote:
>
>The article goes on to say that most courts still require
>a non-biological-father to support the kids he once
>believed were his own. To protect the kids.

The motivation for this is that the legals have decided
that supporting the children is more important than
fairness.  Its that simple; some legals will even admit it.

There are similarly motivated restrictions on how much you can deny your
spouse when you die.

FYI



 






  




Reply via email to