Am 13.11.2014 um 15:08 schrieb Peter Rabbitson <rab...@rabbit.us>: > On 11/13/2014 07:12 AM, Jens Rehsack wrote:> >> >> Reason to keep: People continuous ask me about AnyData / DBD::AnyData and >> send me fiddly patches hacking in the module, complain about working around >> compat issues etc. >> So what I currently know: every AnyData / DBD::AnyData user makes adoptions >> to the projects. >> > > > On 11/13/2014 02:58 PM, Jens Rehsack wrote: >> >> Am 13.11.2014 um 14:37 schrieb Tim Bunce <tim.bu...@pobox.com>: >> >>> My impression was that there was a risk of breaking existing users apps. >>> If that can be avoided then great, and keeping the name would be best. >> >> Neither, nor :( >> They're already broken. > > "everything is already broken" contradicts "people are using it and sending > me patches". It can't be both ways > > It either is completely unused and nobody depends on it > OR > The module is heavily customized and worked around in tons of darkpan > > In the later case imnsho the module needs to be left alone. See Class::DBI > for exactly this sort of case.
I say it once again: The only way to leave it alone is to walk another way (not touching AnyData at all). That will result in no solution for anyone but "political correctness" guards (sorry, I do not see any advantage in the "don't ever do this because it's forbidden in general"). Cheers -- Jens Rehsack rehs...@gmail.com
