dc-rda  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Next level of description Thomas Dukleth
• URIs for relators Rebecca S. Guenther
• Approaching the task as levels ofprecision Karen Coyle
  • Re: Approaching the task as levels ofprecision Thomas Dukleth
• RDF of RDA Jon Phipps
• RDA and MARC - Discussions at ALA Karen Coyle
• More thoughts on value vocabularies Karen Coyle
  • Re: More thoughts on value vocabularies Stephens, Owen
  • Re: More thoughts on value vocabularies Karen Coyle
  • Re: More thoughts on value vocabularies Karen Coyle
  • Re: More thoughts on value vocabularies Diane I. Hillmann
  • Re: More thoughts on value vocabularies Stephens, Owen
  • Re: More thoughts on value vocabularies Karen Coyle
  • Re: More thoughts on value vocabularies Karen Coyle
  • Vocabularies - do we need a website or something? Stephens, Owen
  • Re: Vocabularies - do we need a website or something? Karen Coyle
• New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Diane I. Hillmann
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Pete Johnston
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Jon Phipps
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Karen Coyle
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Simon Spero
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Stephens, Owen
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Karen Coyle
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Pete Johnston
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Karen Coyle
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Stephens, Owen
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Pete Johnston
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Karen Coyle
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) John Attig
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Karen Coyle
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) John Attig
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Karen Coyle
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) John Attig
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Stephens, Owen
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Karen Coyle
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Simon Spero
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Thomas Baker
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Pete Johnston
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Karen Coyle
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Stephens, Owen
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Karen Coyle
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Stephens, Owen
  • some more examples of RDA-defined vocabularies Karen Coyle
  • Re: some more examples of RDA-defined vocabularies Karen Coyle
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Jon Phipps
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Stephens, Owen
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Karen Coyle
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Stephens, Owen
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Karen Coyle
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Stephens, Owen
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Karen Coyle
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Stephens, Owen
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Stephens, Owen
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Karen Coyle
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Thomas Dukleth
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Diane I. Hillmann
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Andy Powell
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Karen Coyle
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Andy Powell
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Thomas Dukleth
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Karen Coyle
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Thomas Dukleth
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Stephens, Owen
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Karen Coyle
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Stephens, Owen
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Karen Coyle
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Stephens, Owen
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Thomas Dukleth
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Karen Coyle
  • MARC URI placement for RDA Thomas Dukleth
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Stephens, Owen
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Thomas Dukleth
  • Re: New RDA Vocabularies available (plus other info) Karen Coyle
• Re: You are now subscribed to the DC-RDA list Jonathan Rochkind
  • Re: You are now subscribed to the DC-RDA list Karen Coyle
• Take a look ... Diane I. Hillmann
• [Fwd: [Web4lib] FW: Letter from Deanna Marcum and Joint Statement on RDA] Diane I. Hillmann
• Progress Report: RDA Vocabularies Project Karen Coyle
  • Re: Progress Report: RDA Vocabularies Project Diane I. Hillmann
  • Re: Progress Report: RDA Vocabularies Project Karen Coyle
  • Re: Progress Report: RDA Vocabularies Project Diane I. Hillmann
• New funder for the DCMI/RDA effort Diane I. Hillmann
• User and developer scenarios Karen Coyle
• How much variation is there in legacy data? Simon Spero
  • Re: How much variation is there in legacy data? Peter Noerr
• Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Mikael Nilsson
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Diane I. Hillmann
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Mikael Nilsson
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Jon Phipps
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Mikael Nilsson
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Karen Coyle
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Diane I. Hillmann
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Pete Johnston
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Karen Coyle
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Thomas Baker
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Karen Coyle
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Rob Styles
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Karen Coyle
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Jonathan Rochkind
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Mikael Nilsson
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Jonathan Rochkind
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Mikael Nilsson
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Simon Spero
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Karen Coyle
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Rob Styles
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Karen Coyle
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Rob Styles
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Mikael Nilsson
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Mikael Nilsson
  • Re: A possible strategy for our literals/non-literals conundrum ... Flack, Irvin

• Later messages