Christine Borgman
Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:18:05 -0700
If there's time to change the name/acronym, the new "fits" will have much better takeup and less confusion.
best, Christine On Jul 14, 2010, at 6:29 AM, Norman Gray wrote:
Greetings. (slightly off topic) On 2010 Jul 12, at 10:44, Swithun Crowe wrote:I plan to use FITS (http://code.google.com/p/fits/)It's rather unfortunate that this library is called FITS, since that makes it easy to confuse it with FITS.FITS, as an archive-quality digital preservation standard, has been around for more than 30 years now, and is well known and broadly supported. I wonder just how many petabytes of FITS format data there are in the world.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FITS http://fits.gsfc.nasa.gov/fits_libraries.htmlAnd if you do a google search for 'fits', four of the ten hits refer to the FITS standard.Best wishes, Norman -- Norman Gray : http://nxg.me.uk
Christine L. Borgman, Professor & Presidential Chair in Information Studies, UCLA
Homepage: http://is.gseis.ucla.edu/cborgman/ Publications: http://works.bepress.com/borgman/