Re: [dccp] DCCP minutes

[Pasi Sarolahti]

On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Andrew Lentvorski wrote:

re udp encapsulation
- Magnus Westerlund: issue will be discussed in tsvarea on Friday.  
Magnus is split on the idea, he sees the benefit, but also the  
concern
- Colin Perkins: we have an implementation of the nat encapsulation
- Murari Sridharan: lots of people are trying to implement, but the  
lack of firewall traversal is stopping people. some udp encap would  
be good.
- Markku Kojo: don't need a spec, just fill out the iana form
- Magnus: yes, but a spec is importent.

What was the final result about UDP encapsulation and NAT traversal?

You forgot to quote one line from this part:

- Colin: why don't we just publish Tom Phelan's draft as  
experimental? Ask Tom to resubmit it (or I'll do it...)

I believe Tom plans to update the UDP encapsulation draft, and when  
done, we will then see where to go from there.

- Pasi