dearhabermas  

Re: comments on sex abuse and the church

RLC McLaughlin
Mon, 29 Apr 2002 19:34:52 -0700

Jolene,
 
    I'm so glad that you replied and more so, that you too are able to have some positive experiences in the Catholic church to reflect on in such a tumultuous time.  I empathize with your situation, knowing that feeling in your gut when someone turns around in light of a heated debate, and says, "You're Catholic, what do you think"?  I had to take time to try to understand why I felt so violated in an atmosphere of reckless remarks.  Like ourselves, I'm sure Father Chris would appreciate your letter of encouragement.
 
    Thank you for replying so kindly and understanding my poor interpretation to your original letter.  Though not YOUR intention, my interpretation was indeed what I've heard so much already, and your letter urged my response.  It was still well, although belated my reply, to receive your follow-up letter too.  Funny how things work out, isn't it?
 
Love and peace to both you and Sean.
-mac
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: comments on sex abuse and the church

     Thanks, Mac.  I appreciated your honesty in sharing your life experiences in growing up. You shed some positive light on the subject and made some very good points, especially about the fact that there are many more good than bad priests. Your sharing was so different from our negative discussion last night where I felt too intimidated to respond and just remained silent (one of my many defects of character).  I felt so ashamed from where I came from, a Catholic background and I just didn't feel like it was a "safe" place to share.     
     Throughout the years, I have sought counsel with many priests who were comforting and kind.   My son had befriended Father Chris before he was transferred to another parish.  My son is victimized every day at a public middle school because he is different. The bullies zero in on him, they always do nail the most vulnerable.  My son was just newly diagnosed with Asberger's Syndrome, a high functioning form of autism.  Father Chris was one priest he connected with and now misses, very much.......perhaps it's time for me to write Father C and thank him for helping to make Sean's day a little brighter. Thanks again, Mac, for your courage and conviction. 
Peace,
Jolene
p.s. Does anyone out there know about a good support group for parents with children who have Asberger's Syndrome?
In a message dated 4/26/02 8:16:04 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:




Dear Jeanne,

It's easy to jump onto a popular bandwagon, and I don't fault anyone for
giving in to the current tidal wave of media blitz and spin.  But whenever
I've allowed myself to do that in the past and responded in a singularly
emotional manner, I felt as though I'd been caught with venom on my face. 
So I try to remind myself to slow down, look at the total picture, and
THINK, rather than simply respond.


Priests who molest children are vile.  No doubt.  The violation of any sworn
office is treachery, and the abuse of any power is degrading; to the office,
to the holder of the office, and most especially to the victim. Whether it's
a priest or a president or a parent, the effect is the same; no more, no
less.  What is easily forgotten in this time of scandal and outrage is that
the priesthood encompasses far more good men than bad.  Without this
acknowledgement, the constant barrage of blame and accusations loses
validity.  Individual transgression that are allowed to expand until they
indict an entire group can be dangerous.  Time usually prevails, and
relegates hysteria to forgotten history.  But not always.  At the moment a
faithful, practicing Catholic might be viewed as ignorant and uninformed.
Tomorrow, the assessment might be more severe.

Jolene said, "I think that they all need to 'come out of the closet' if they
are gay and that's why they chose that profession."  This seems to
assume that gays are automatically pedophiles, and that the only reason they
pursued the priesthood was because they're gay.  This is an injustice to
gays, an injustice to men, and an injustice to the beliefs that are held by
a great many people.  Gays are accepted into the priesthood of the Catholic
Church; the sexual restrictions placed upon gays are identical to the
restrictions placed upon heterosexuals.  Sexual orientation is not an issue;
sexual activity is.  Homosexuality no more inhibits the sense of
accomplishing "the work of God" than the condition of heterosexuality would
do.  Therefore, sexual orientation is as irrelevant in the choice of
profession within the clergy as it is within any other profession.

Pedophilia is sickening, but the occupation of the pedophile is of no
significance.  Pediatricians, psychologists, fathers, mothers, aunts,
teachers, Boy Scout leaders, babysitters, postmen, lawyers, police officers,
social workers...take your pick.  If an opportunity is sought, it will
eventually be found; a pedophile in search of children will find them.  This
is the issue.  This is what must be addressed.  To focus on the Church is to
lose sight of the true target.  It accomplishes nothing in solving the
problem.  But to state that pedophiles need to "come out of the closet" only
labors the obvious and provides potential victims with nothing more than
useless gestures, feel-good rhetoric, and a blind eye turned momentarily in
the right direction.  What's lost in the cacophony is that the priesthood,
like every other organization in the world, is made up of people.  The
Catholic church is made up of people.  And people screw up.

While I am no longer practicing, I was raised Catholic, and have know many
priests.  Father Kelly, Father Blaney, Father Crow, Father Mason... they
were the positive, influential males in my childhood.  I've still never met
men so kind and honorable as were these simple priests, and I wonder
sometimes if it was they who kept me from hating the world.  My father is a
pedophile, and a violent one.  So my memories of priests are made of times
like the morning at school when Father Mason sang "When Irish Eyes Are
Smiling" to me.   I'd been so sad.  My father had called me, among other
things, a "cunt" and thrown hot coffee in my face not more than an hour
before.  Father Mason gave me back all that my father had taken away.  He
replaced the fear and the futility and the bewilderment that was inside of
me with hope and love and safety.  He was my protector, my champion, and to
have him assigned to the pedophile's pigeon-hole is something I will not
allow to happen.     I could go on and on, with countless examples of good
men in the priesthood and all that they did for me and my sisters and
brother.  Churches are full of good men, as are mosques and synagogues and
neighborhoods and schools and Boy Scouts and...but you get my point.
Pedophiles should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, because
they murder the spirit.  If only there were as much energy directed at
protecting potential victims as there is presently directed toward the
administrative failings and alleged cover-ups of the Catholic Church,
something quite wonderful might happen.

Sadly, I believe Jolene speaks for many.  When I hear a Catholic comment to
a newsperson that they're ashamed of being Catholic because of what has
occurred, it breaks my heart.  I think of the honorable men and women who've
foregone any semblance of what is considered a 'good' life, and are,
instead, there to comfort and reassure little girls who have had hot coffee
thrown in their faces.  I pray that people recognize that the children
require advocacy, and that the criminals require justice.  The Church
requires only time.  It's been there in times worse and better than this.
It's reformed itself, modernized itself, modified itself, all due to the
readjustments necessary to identify, articulate, and perhaps isolate the
infinite potential of the human condition.  It reflects the times, and deals
with whatever it is we present to it at any given moment.  But always in
it's own good time.  It has plenty.

Love and peace,
Mac