Andreas Tille
Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:45:01 -0700
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
well, i really think "Integrated Debian Distribution" is worth considering. or "Integrated Debian Subdistribution". though i see some weakness in the term "Distribution", i don't see it as the primary problem for CDD, rather the "Custom" was the primary issue. maybe not...
In case you have any proposal currently not on the poll but want me to add it, please use the syntax: Andreas please add the name "..." to the poll.
and i prefer "Integrated Debian Projects" over "Debian Integrated Projects". something about it just makes more sense to me.
So well, you and me are the only ones who voted positively for this item and I would call this a missinterpretation of your proposal and so I changed the poll to this suggestion. The chance for missinterpretation is drastically reduced if people use the syntax above. One technical question: I did not really found an "official" way to change your vote (which has to be done once the poll changes by adding / fixing an option). I was clever enough to store the link from my first voting which included some &participantName=Andreas+Tille&participantId=... &credential=... arguments. This worked for me - but I have no idea what to do if you do not have the credential argument (the two above are not enough).
it is an shame that flavour is also spelled flavor, as i think Debian Integrated Flavor or Integrated Debian Flavour ... really hits home with the Integrated clearly defining that it's part of Debian, and Flavour making it a nice food related analogy. Debian Integrated Focus ? (or my usual Integrated first preference..)
Please see above. IMHO we do not need more "random" suggestions.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]