On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:01:15 +0100 "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:43:41AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > > Well, if any program were to actually depend on this virtual package, > > they'd need to know which encoder was being used in order to correctly > > support the differing argument conventions. In which case, why not just > > depend on the encoders they know how to support, which is presumably a > > finite list? > > One could of course make a standardized shell wrapper for all the packages. I think that's the idea behind the music123 package, but for playing. Maybe this is a good starting point for the mp3-encoder one. regards, -- Ricardo Mones Lastra - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Centro de Inteligencia Artificial, Universidad de Oviedo en Gijon 33271 Asturias, SPAIN. - http://www.aic.uniovi.es/mones -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
