Scripsit Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The point is that I want to massage some parts of the configuration
> and not others. I want the others to continue to get updated by the
> normal package installation process.
So is the whole thing essentially a workaround for dpkg's current
lack of good conffile update management, or would you still prefer the
separate files way if dpkg magically gained a well-tested and stable
conflict resolution scheme with bells, whistles, and 3-way merges?
--
Henning Makholm "G� ud i solen eller regnen, smil, k�b en ny tr�je,
sl� en sludder af med k�bmanden, puds dine st�vler. Lev!"
