debian-legal  

Messages by Thread

• License impact of opencore-amr and vo-aacenc/amrwbenc Fabian Greffrath
  • Re: License impact of opencore-amr and vo-aacenc/amrwbenc MJ Ray
• custom license (package: bwctl) Raoul Borenius
  • Re: custom license (package: bwctl) Clark C. Evans
  • Re: custom license (package: bwctl) Walter Landry
  • Re: custom license (package: bwctl) Clark C. Evans
  • Re: custom license (package: bwctl) Francesco Poli
  • Re: custom license (package: bwctl) Charles Plessy
  • Re: custom license (package: bwctl) Clark C. Evans
  • Re: custom license (package: bwctl) Charles Plessy
  • Re: custom license (package: bwctl) Clark C. Evans
  • Re: custom license (package: bwctl) Francesco Poli
  • Re: custom license (package: bwctl) Raoul Borenius
• Qt Eclipse integration license (discriminating against group of users) Jakub Adam
  • Re: Qt Eclipse integration license (discriminating against group of users) Walter Landry
  • Re: Qt Eclipse integration license (discriminating against group of users) Gunnar Wolf
• La proxima semana: II Congreso Feria de Alimentacion Consciente Ciencia y Espiritu
• Fwd: Re: Copyright and License status of "transtab" Clint Byrum
  • Re: Fwd: Re: Copyright and License status of "transtab" Francesco Poli
  • Re: Fwd: Re: Copyright and License status of "transtab" Charles Plessy
• MIT +no-false-attribs Jérémy Lal
  • Re: MIT +no-false-attribs Paul Wise
  • Re: MIT +no-false-attribs Jérémy Lal
  • Re: MIT +no-false-attribs Ben Finney
  • Re: MIT +no-false-attribs Tanguy Ortolo
  • Re: MIT +no-false-attribs Francesco Poli
  • Re: MIT +no-false-attribs MJ Ray
• "Forget Me Not" - Commensurate Attribution Clark C. Evans
  • Re: "Forget Me Not" - Commensurate Attribution Clark C. Evans
  • Re: "Forget Me Not" - Commensurate Attribution Francesco Poli
  • Re: "Forget Me Not" - Commensurate Attribution Clark C. Evans
  • Re: "Forget Me Not" - Commensurate Attribution Francesco Poli
  • Re: "Forget Me Not" - Commensurate Attribution Clark C. Evans
• legal aspects of packaging nagios-sap-ccms Harald Jenny
  • Re: legal aspects of packaging nagios-sap-ccms Paul Wise
  • Re: legal aspects of packaging nagios-sap-ccms Ciaran Farrell
  • Re: legal aspects of packaging nagios-sap-ccms Paul Wise
  • Re: legal aspects of packaging nagios-sap-ccms Ben Finney
  • Re: legal aspects of packaging nagios-sap-ccms Ciaran Farrell
  • Re: legal aspects of packaging nagios-sap-ccms Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
  • Re: legal aspects of packaging nagios-sap-ccms Harald Jenny
• ITP fsmark - bug 655224: License restriction for lib_timing.c DFSG compliant? Martin Steigerwald
  • Re: ITP fsmark - bug 655224: License restriction for lib_timing.c DFSG compliant? Ben Finney
  • Re: ITP fsmark - bug 655224: License restriction for lib_timing.c DFSG compliant? Martin Steigerwald
  • Re: ITP fsmark - bug 655224: License restriction for lib_timing.c DFSG compliant? Ben Finney
  • Re: ITP fsmark - bug 655224: License restriction for lib_timing.c DFSG compliant? Clark C. Evans
  • Re: ITP fsmark - bug 655224: License restriction for lib_timing.c DFSG compliant? Martin Steigerwald
  • Re: ITP fsmark - bug 655224: License restriction for lib_timing.c DFSG compliant? Ben Finney
• GPLv3/Apache argument brought up some concerns over the current state of the GPL Felyza Wishbringer
  • Re: GPLv3/Apache argument brought up some concerns over the current state of the GPL Clark C. Evans
  • Re: GPLv3/Apache argument brought up some concerns over the current state of the GPL Jeff Epler
• GPG key issue Francesco Namuri
  • Re: GPG key issue Steve Langasek
  • Re: GPG key issue Francesco Namuri
• need help with openscad's license chrysn
  • Re: need help with openscad's license Francesco Poli
  • Re: need help with openscad's license chrysn
  • Re: need help with openscad's license Francesco Poli
  • Re: need help with openscad's license Walter Landry
• Debian official web site is still non-free Francesco Poli
  • Re: Debian official web site is still non-free Francesco Poli
  • Re: Debian official web site is still non-free Francesco Poli
  • Re: Debian official web site is still non-free Stefano Zacchiroli
  • Re: Debian official web site is still non-free Francesco Poli
  • Re: Debian official web site is still non-free Stefano Zacchiroli
  • Re: Debian official web site is still non-free Charles Plessy
  • Re: Debian official web site is still non-free Don Armstrong
  • Re: Debian official web site is still non-free Francesco Poli
  • Ask contributors a permission to relicense David Prévot
  • Re: Ask contributors a permission to relicense Francesco Poli
  • Re: Ask contributors a permission to relicense Wols Lists
  • Re: Ask contributors a permission to relicense Francesco Poli
  • Re: Bug#388141: Ask contributors a permission to relicense Charles Plessy
  • Re: Ask contributors a permission to relicense Hugo Roy
• Local community license issue Victor Nitu
  • Re: Local community license issue Francesco Poli
  • Re: Local community license issue Charles Plessy
  • Re: Local community license issue Clark C. Evans
• El usuario "Elena" te invita dar alta en el foroFeminista. Feminista - foro feminino
• Re: [copyright law wackyness] Martin Husovec
  • Re: [copyright law wackyness] Martin Husovec
• torque license change Dominique Belhachemi
  • Re: torque license change Ben Finney
  • Re: torque license change Francesco Poli
  • Re: torque license change Dominique Belhachemi
• ISP-Equipment.com: You are not a member! ListAdmin
• Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Kay Hayen
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment MJ Ray
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Kay Hayen
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Ben Finney
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Kay Hayen
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Tanguy Ortolo
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Kay Hayen
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Tanguy Ortolo
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Christofer C. Bell
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Kay Hayen
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Tanguy Ortolo
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Kay Hayen
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Kay Hayen
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Tanguy Ortolo
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Kay Hayen
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Ben Finney
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Kay Hayen
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Ben Finney
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Kay Hayen
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Ben Finney
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Kay Hayen
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Tanguy Ortolo
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Kay Hayen
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Francesco Poli
  • Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment Kay Hayen
• Licence for new package algol68toc Sian Mountbatten
  • Re: Licence for new package algol68toc Ben Finney
  • Re: Licence for new package algol68toc Ben Finney
• Mozilla Public License 2.0 released Paul Wise
  • Re: Mozilla Public License 2.0 released MJ Ray
  • Re: Mozilla Public License 2.0 released Paul Wise
  • Re: Mozilla Public License 2.0 released MJ Ray
  • Re: Mozilla Public License 2.0 released Francesco Poli
  • Re: Mozilla Public License 2.0 released Francesco Poli
  • Re: Mozilla Public License 2.0 released Gervase Markham
  • Re: Mozilla Public License 2.0 released Francesco Poli
  • Re: Mozilla Public License 2.0 released Gervase Markham
  • Re: Mozilla Public License 2.0 released Francesco Poli
• Tagged as PD, clear enough? Martin Erik Werner
  • Re: Tagged as PD, clear enough? Martin Erik Werner
• exFAT fuse driver and the patent situation Sven Hoexter
  • Re: exFAT fuse driver and the patent situation Marco d'Itri
  • Re: exFAT fuse driver and the patent situation Paul Wise
  • Re: exFAT fuse driver and the patent situation Sven Hoexter
  • Re: exFAT fuse driver and the patent situation Alexey Eromenko
  • Re: exFAT fuse driver and the patent situation Sven Hoexter
  • Re: exFAT fuse driver and the patent situation Osamu Aoki
• UNSUSCRIBE Cedric MONTUY
  • UNSUSCRIBE Cedric MONTUY
• copyright law wackyness Paul Wise
  • Re: copyright law wackyness Ben Finney
  • Re: copyright law wackyness Paul Wise
  • Re: copyright law wackyness Tanguy Ortolo
  • Re: copyright law wackyness Chris Harshman
  • Re: copyright law wackyness Francesco Poli
  • Re: copyright law wackyness Ben Finney
  • Re: copyright law wackyness Florian Weimer
  • Re: copyright law wackyness Tanguy Ortolo
  • Re: copyright law wackyness Florian Weimer
  • Re: copyright law wackyness Bernhard R. Link
  • Re: copyright law wackyness Florian Weimer
  • Re: copyright law wackyness Bernhard R. Link
  • Re: copyright law wackyness Arnoud Engelfriet
• International Free and Open Source Software Law Review #5 published Paul Wise
• Unsure If Array 30 Chinese Input Method is DFSG Free or Not. 魏銘廷
  • Re: Unsure If Array 30 Chinese Input Method is DFSG Free or Not. Paul Wise
  • Re: Unsure If Array 30 Chinese Input Method is DFSG Free or Not. Christofer C. Bell
  • Re: Unsure If Array 30 Chinese Input Method is DFSG Free or Not. 魏銘廷
  • Re: Unsure If Array 30 Chinese Input Method is DFSG Free or Not. Josselin Mouette
  • Re: Unsure If Array 30 Chinese Input Method is DFSG Free or Not. MJ Ray
• Thoughts on GPL's Appropriate Legal Notices? or the CPAL? Clark C. Evans
  • Re: Thoughts on GPL's Appropriate Legal Notices? or the CPAL? Francesco Poli
  • Re: Thoughts on GPL's Appropriate Legal Notices? or the CPAL? Simon McVittie
  • Re: Thoughts on GPL's Appropriate Legal Notices? or the CPAL? MJ Ray
  • Re: Thoughts on GPL's Appropriate Legal Notices? or the CPAL? Richard Fontana
  • Re: Thoughts on GPL's Appropriate Legal Notices? or the CPAL? MJ Ray
  • Re: Thoughts on GPL's Appropriate Legal Notices? or the CPAL? Richard Fontana
  • Re: Thoughts on GPL's Appropriate Legal Notices? or the CPAL? Don Armstrong
  • Re: Thoughts on GPL's Appropriate Legal Notices? or the CPAL? Clark C. Evans
  • Re: Thoughts on GPL's Appropriate Legal Notices? or the CPAL? Don Armstrong
  • Re: Thoughts on GPL's Appropriate Legal Notices? or the CPAL? Clark C. Evans
  • Re: Thoughts on GPL's Appropriate Legal Notices? or the CPAL? Simon McVittie
  • Re: Thoughts on GPL's Appropriate Legal Notices? or the CPAL? Richard Fontana
  • Re: Thoughts on GPL's Appropriate Legal Notices? or the CPAL? Ben Finney
  • Re: Thoughts on GPL's Appropriate Legal Notices? or the CPAL? Clark C. Evans
• conflict between name and text of a license Cédric Boutillier
  • Re: conflict between name and text of a license Charles Plessy
  • Re: Re: conflict between name and text of a license Cédric Boutillier
• FYI: Creative Commons 4.0 process starts Paul Wise
  • Re: FYI: Creative Commons 4.0 process starts Stefano Zacchiroli
  • Re: FYI: Creative Commons 4.0 process starts Gunnar Wolf
  • Re: FYI: Creative Commons 4.0 process starts Francesco Poli
• Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ? Joey Hess
  • Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ? Clark C. Evans
  • Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ? David Prévot
  • Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ? Clark C. Evans
  • Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ? Francesco Poli
  • Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ? Francesco Poli
  • Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ? Alexey Eromenko
  • Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ? Andrei Popescu
  • Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ? Clark C. Evans
  • Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ? Andrei Popescu
  • Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ? Alexey Eromenko
  • Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ? Christofer C. Bell
  • Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ? Clark C. Evans
  • Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ? Christofer C. Bell
  • Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ? Alexey Eromenko
  • Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ? Alexey Eromenko
  • Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ? Alexey Eromenko
  • Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ? Jeff Epler
  • Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ? Tanguy Ortolo
  • Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ? Alexey Eromenko
  • Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ? Tanguy Ortolo
  • Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ? Clark C. Evans

• Earlier messages